Hi Dave,
Here are a few amdkfd patches for 4.6.
These patches defer radeon/amdgpu loading in case amdkfd is not yet loaded,
by returning -EPROBE_DEFER during their probing stage.
Thanks,
Oded
The following changes since commit 44ab4042178bd596275927ea050980aa4257581b:
Merge branch 'for-next'
https://www.bountysource.com/issues/5643054-radeonsi-x11-can-t-start-with-acceleration-enabled
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113341
Bug ID: 113341
Summary: GPU Lockup on AMD Kaveri
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 4.4.2
Hardware: x86-64
OS: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Sta
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112491
--- Comment #14 from Dionisus Torimens ---
Created attachment 206311
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=206311&action=edit
Temperature Graph with nomodeset radeon.modeset=1 without redshift
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112491
--- Comment #13 from Dionisus Torimens ---
Created attachment 206301
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=206301&action=edit
Temperature Graph with nomodeset radeon.modeset=1 and redshift
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112491
Dionisus Torimens changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #203781|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112491
--- Comment #12 from Dionisus Torimens ---
[Wonderful, fglrx doesn't work at all with kernel 4.2... ...]
The fastest way to get the system to overheat is to
- enable redshift (or probably xgamma)
- disable vsync
- set dpm to preformance*
echo pe
ed to
radeon_compute_pll_avivo() in atombios_adjust_pll().
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20160227/65a1eb54/attachment.html>
tps://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20160227/0a73dbf5/attachment.html>
scrubbed...
URL:
<https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20160227/1620b00b/attachment.html>
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 10:50:40AM +0100, walter harms wrote:
>
>
> Am 25.02.2016 08:47, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> > It's simpler to just use snprintf() to print this to one buffer instead
> > of using strcpy() and strcat(). Also using snprintf() is slightly safer
> > than using sprintf().
> >
>
Hi Emil,
2016-02-27 Emil Velikov :
> Hi Gustavo,
>
> On 26 February 2016 at 18:31, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> > From: Gustavo Padovan
> >
> > Play safe and add flags member to all structs. So we don't need to
> > break API or create new IOCTL in the future if new features that requires
> > flags
Hi Emil,
2016-02-27 Emil Velikov :
> Hi Gustavo,
>
> On 26 February 2016 at 21:00, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> > From: Gustavo Padovan
> >
> > Change SYNC_IOC_FILE_INFO behaviour to avoid future API breaks and
> > optimize buffer allocation. In the new approach the ioctl needs to be called
> > tw
Am 27.02.2016 11:40, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 10:50:40AM +0100, walter harms wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 25.02.2016 08:47, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
>>> It's simpler to just use snprintf() to print this to one buffer instead
>>> of using strcpy() and strcat(). Also using snprintf() i
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112921
Jean Delvare changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from Jean Delvare
Am 25.02.2016 08:47, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> It's simpler to just use snprintf() to print this to one buffer instead
> of using strcpy() and strcat(). Also using snprintf() is slightly safer
> than using sprintf().
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/
Hi Gustavo,
On 26 February 2016 at 18:31, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> From: Gustavo Padovan
>
> Play safe and add flags member to all structs. So we don't need to
> break API or create new IOCTL in the future if new features that requires
> flags arises.
>
> v2: check if flags are valid (zero, in t
Hi Gustavo,
On 26 February 2016 at 21:00, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> From: Gustavo Padovan
>
> Change SYNC_IOC_FILE_INFO behaviour to avoid future API breaks and
> optimize buffer allocation. In the new approach the ioctl needs to be called
> twice to retrieve the array of fence_infos pointed by i
On 26 February 2016 at 15:43, Lionel Landwerlin
wrote:
> On 26/02/16 00:36, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>
>> Hi Lionel,
>>
>> A bunch of suggestions - feel free to take or ignore them :-)
>>
>> On 25 February 2016 at 10:58, Lionel Landwerlin
>> wrote:
> I'm not sure it matters as the drm_crtc_state you
19 matches
Mail list logo