Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] drm/bridge: tc358768: Fixes and timings improvements

2023-09-17 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
Hi bridge maintainers! On 06/09/2023 09:50, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: This series contains various fixes and cleanups for TC358768. The target of this work is to get TC358768 working on Toradex's AM62 based board, which has the following display pipeline: AM62 DPI -> TC358768 -> LT8912B -> HDMI

Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] drm: atmel_hlcdc: Add support for XLCDC in atmel LCD driver

2023-09-17 Thread claudiu beznea
On 12.09.2023 13:44, manikanda...@microchip.com wrote: > On 09/09/23 9:50 pm, claudiu beznea wrote: >> [You don't often get email from claudiu.bez...@tuxon.dev. Learn why this is >> important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] >> >> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open

Re: [PATCH v6,4/4] drm/mediatek: dp: Add support MT8188 dp/edp function

2023-09-17 Thread 胡俊光

Re: [PATCH] drm/omap: dsi: Fix deferred probe warnings

2023-09-17 Thread Tony Lindgren
* H. Nikolaus Schaller [230916 12:50]: > Hi Tomi and Tony, > > > Am 13.09.2023 um 13:59 schrieb Tomi Valkeinen > > : > > > > On 12/04/2023 10:39, Tony Lindgren wrote: > >> We may not have dsi->dsidev initialized during probe, and that can > >> lead into various dsi related warnings as

Re: [PATCH v6,3/4] drm/mediatek: dp: Add the audio divider to mtk_dp_data struct

2023-09-17 Thread 胡俊光

Re: [PATCH v6, 2/4] drm/mediatek: dp: Add the audio packet flag to mtk_dp_data struct

2023-09-17 Thread 胡俊光

Re: [PATCH v10 03/16] drm/mediatek: gamma: Support SoC specific LUT size

2023-09-17 Thread 胡俊光

[PATCH v7 1/3] drm/i915/pxp/mtl: Update pxp-firmware response timeout

2023-09-17 Thread Alan Previn
Update the max GSC-fw response time to match updated internal fw specs. Because this response time is an SLA on the firmware, not inclusive of i915->GuC->HW handoff latency, when submitting requests to the GSC fw via intel_gsc_uc_heci_cmd_submit helpers, start the count after the request hits the

[PATCH v7 3/3] drm/i915/lrc: User PXP contexts requires runalone bit in lrc

2023-09-17 Thread Alan Previn
On Meteorlake onwards, HW specs require that all user contexts that run on render or compute engines and require PXP must enforce run-alone bit in lrc. Add this enforcement for protected contexts. Signed-off-by: Alan Previn Reviewed-by: Vivaik Balasubrawmanian ---

[PATCH v7 2/3] drm/i915/pxp/mtl: Update pxp-firmware packet size

2023-09-17 Thread Alan Previn
Update the GSC-fw input/output HECI packet size to match updated internal fw specs. Signed-off-by: Alan Previn Reviewed-by: Vivaik Balasubrawmanian --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_cmd_interface_43.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git

[PATCH v7 0/3] drm/i915/pxp/mtl: Update gsc-heci cmd submission to align with fw/hw spec

2023-09-17 Thread Alan Previn
For MTL, update the GSC-HECI packet size and the max firmware response timeout to match internal fw specs. Enforce setting run-alone bit in LRC for protected contexts. Changes from prio revs: v6: - fix build error with PXP config (Alan) v5: - PAGE_ALIGN typo fix (Alan). - Use macro

Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] drm/i915/pxp/mtl: Update pxp-firmware response timeout

2023-09-17 Thread Teres Alexis, Alan Previn
On Sat, 2023-09-16 at 10:25 +0800, lkp wrote: > Hi Alan, > > kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: > > [auto build test ERROR on cf1e91e884bb1113c653e654e9de1754fc1d4488] > > aAll errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > > alan:snip alan: missed building with PXP config after that

[PATCH 5.15 392/511] drm/ast: Fix DRAM init on AST2200

2023-09-17 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
5.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Thomas Zimmermann commit 4cfe75f0f14f044dae66ad0e6eea812d038465d9 upstream. Fix the test for the AST2200 in the DRAM initialization. The value in ast->chip has to be compared against an enum

[PATCH 5.15 333/511] backlight/bd6107: Compare against struct fb_info.device

2023-09-17 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
5.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Thomas Zimmermann commit 992bdddaabfba19bdc77c1c7a4977b2aa41ec891 upstream. Struct bd6107_platform_data refers to a platform device within the Linux device hierarchy. The test in

[PATCH 5.15 332/511] backlight/gpio_backlight: Compare against struct fb_info.device

2023-09-17 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
5.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Thomas Zimmermann commit 7b91d017f77c1bda56f27c2f4bbb70de7c6eca08 upstream. Struct gpio_backlight_platform_data refers to a platform device within the Linux device hierarchy. The test in

[PATCH 5.15 334/511] backlight/lv5207lp: Compare against struct fb_info.device

2023-09-17 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
5.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Thomas Zimmermann commit 1ca8819320fd84e7d95b04e7668efc5f9fe9fa5c upstream. Struct lv5207lp_platform_data refers to a platform device within the Linux device hierarchy. The test in

[PATCH 6.1 028/219] drm/ast: Fix DRAM init on AST2200

2023-09-17 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
6.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Thomas Zimmermann commit 4cfe75f0f14f044dae66ad0e6eea812d038465d9 upstream. Fix the test for the AST2200 in the DRAM initialization. The value in ast->chip has to be compared against an enum

[PATCH 6.5 022/285] drm/ast: Fix DRAM init on AST2200

2023-09-17 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
6.5-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Thomas Zimmermann commit 4cfe75f0f14f044dae66ad0e6eea812d038465d9 upstream. Fix the test for the AST2200 in the DRAM initialization. The value in ast->chip has to be compared against an enum

[PATCH 5.10 323/406] drm/ast: Fix DRAM init on AST2200

2023-09-17 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Thomas Zimmermann commit 4cfe75f0f14f044dae66ad0e6eea812d038465d9 upstream. Fix the test for the AST2200 in the DRAM initialization. The value in ast->chip has to be compared against an enum

[PATCH 5.10 282/406] backlight/lv5207lp: Compare against struct fb_info.device

2023-09-17 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Thomas Zimmermann commit 1ca8819320fd84e7d95b04e7668efc5f9fe9fa5c upstream. Struct lv5207lp_platform_data refers to a platform device within the Linux device hierarchy. The test in

[PATCH 5.10 280/406] backlight/gpio_backlight: Compare against struct fb_info.device

2023-09-17 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Thomas Zimmermann commit 7b91d017f77c1bda56f27c2f4bbb70de7c6eca08 upstream. Struct gpio_backlight_platform_data refers to a platform device within the Linux device hierarchy. The test in

[PATCH 5.10 281/406] backlight/bd6107: Compare against struct fb_info.device

2023-09-17 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Thomas Zimmermann commit 992bdddaabfba19bdc77c1c7a4977b2aa41ec891 upstream. Struct bd6107_platform_data refers to a platform device within the Linux device hierarchy. The test in

Re: [RFC PATCH] drm: omapdrm: dsi: add refsel also for omap4

2023-09-17 Thread Andreas Kemnade
Am Wed, 13 Sep 2023 15:58:11 +0300 schrieb Tomi Valkeinen : > On 13/09/2023 15:48, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Tomi Valkeinen [230913 12:11]: > >> I'm somewhat sure that the upstream driver used to work on omap4 > >> sdp, which has two DSI panels. But I can't even remember what > >> omap4

Re: [PATCH 0/7] accel/qaic: Extend uAPI to support undoing ATTACH_SLICE_BO

2023-09-17 Thread Stanislaw Gruszka
On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 11:22:40AM -0600, Jeffrey Hugo wrote: > A BO for a QAIC device has two states - > 1. Allocated > 2. Sliced > > A BO can be allocated at any time, and is initialized in the allocated state. > A BO can transition to the sliced state via ATTACH_SLICE_BO. This prepares > the

Re: [PATCH 7/7] accel/qaic: Add QAIC_DETACH_SLICE_BO IOCTL

2023-09-17 Thread Stanislaw Gruszka
On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 11:22:47AM -0600, Jeffrey Hugo wrote: > From: Pranjal Ramajor Asha Kanojiya > > Once a BO is attached with slicing configuration that BO can only be used > for that particular setting. With this new feature user can detach slicing > configuration off an already sliced BO

Re: [PATCH 6/7] accel/qaic: Create a function to initialize BO

2023-09-17 Thread Stanislaw Gruszka
On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 11:22:46AM -0600, Jeffrey Hugo wrote: > From: Pranjal Ramajor Asha Kanojiya > > This makes sure that we have a single place to initialize and > re-initialize BO. > > Use this new API to cleanup release_dbc() > > We will need this for next patch to detach slicing to a

[syzbot] [dri?] linux-next boot error: WARNING: bad unlock balance in vkms_vblank_simulate

2023-09-17 Thread syzbot
Hello, syzbot found the following issue on: HEAD commit:e143016b56ec Add linux-next specific files for 20230913 git tree: linux-next console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=164c5ac7a8 kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=76ee1517f109f01a