[PATCH v2] drm/panfrost: initial dual core group GPUs support

such flags until someone (myself) steps up to do the Mesa work. Signed-off-by: Alexey Sheplyakov Signed-off-by: Vadim V. Vlasov Tested-by: Alexey Sheplyakov --- drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gpu.c | 27 - 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/panfrost: adjusted job affinity for dual core group GPUs

Hi, Steven! Thanks for such a detailed explanation of T628 peculiarities. On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 05:03:15PM +, Steven Price wrote: > On 10/01/2022 17:42, Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote: > >> Whether it's worth the effort depends on whether anyone really cares > >> about getting the full

Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/panfrost: adjusted job affinity for dual core group GPUs

Hi, Alyssa, On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 12:42:44PM -0500, Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote: > > Whether it's worth the effort depends on whether anyone really cares > > about getting the full performance out of this particular GPU. > > > > At this stage I think the main UABI change would be to add the

Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/panfrost: mmu: improved memory attributes

0) [ 73.547753] ---[ end trace 1af2dce52aebcc96 ]--- However my patch does not work for Exynos 5422 either, so I'll drop the first patch. > > Thanks, > Robin. > > > Signed-off-by: Alexey Sheplyakov > > Signed-off-by: Vadim V. Vlasov > > > > Cc: Rob Herring

Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/panfrost: adjusted job affinity for dual core group GPUs

Hi, On 23.12.2021 18:11, Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote: >> The kernel driver itself can't guess which jobs need a such a strict >> affinity, so setting proper requirements is the responsibility of >> the userspace (Mesa). However the userspace is not smart enough [yet]. >> Therefore this patch applies