On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 9:28 PM Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>
> The A702 is a weird mix of 600 and 700 series.. Perhaps even a
> testing ground for some A7xx features with good ol' A6xx silicon.
> It's basically A610 that's been beefed up with some new registers
> and hw features (like APRIV!), that was
On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 3:52 AM Dmitry Baryshkov
wrote:
>
> Import Adreno registers database for A6xx from the Mesa, commit
> 639488f924d9 ("freedreno/registers: limit the rules schema").
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/registers/adreno/a6xx.xml | 4970
>
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 7:47 PM Dmitry Baryshkov
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 at 21:32, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 3/26/2024 12:10 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 at 20:31, Abhinav Kumar
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 3/26/2024 11:19 AM, Dmitry
eck.
>
> Rather than adding the check to a6xx_set_ubwc_config(), fill in the
> UBWC config for a618 (based on readings from SC7180).
>
> Reported-by: Leonard Lausen
> Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/issues/49
> Fixes: 8814455a0e54 ("drm/msm: Refactor UBWC config s
k. Thus it ends up rewriting hardware registers with the default
> (incorrect) values. Add the !a618 check to this function.
>
> Reported-by: Leonard Lausen
> Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/issues/49
> Fixes: 8814455a0e54 ("drm/msm: Refactor UBWC config setting