mpatibles
> are either used by the existing DT or were used previously and are
> retained for backwards compatibility.
>
> Suggested-by: Doug Anderson
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov
> ---
> The following compatibles were never used by the devices supported by
> the
Hi,
On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 4:39 AM Haikun Zhou
wrote:
>
> Add support for the CMN N116BCJ-EAK, place the raw EDID here for
> subsequent reference.
> 00 ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 0d ae 60 11 00 00 00 00
> 04 22 01 04 95 1a 0e 78 02 67 75 98 59 53 90 27
> 1c 50 54 00 00 00 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01
Hi,
On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 4:05 PM Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>
> Since commit 5acf49119630 ("drm/msm: import gen_header.py script from Mesa"),
> compilation is broken on machines having python versions older than 3.9
> due to dependency on argparse.BooleanOptionalAction.
>
> Switch to use simple bool
Hi,
On Sun, May 19, 2024 at 2:01 AM Dmitry Baryshkov
wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 03:55:14PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > Prefer the struct drm_edid based functions for reading the EDID and
> > updating the connector.
> >
> > Simplify the flow by updating the EDID property when the EDID
Hi,
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 6:43 AM Doug Anderson wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 11:55 PM wrote:
> >
> > On 16/05/2024 08:43, cong yang wrote:
> > > Hi:
> > >
> > > If it is determined that a separately patch needs to be sen
Hi,
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 11:55 PM wrote:
>
> On 16/05/2024 08:43, cong yang wrote:
> > Hi:
> >
> > If it is determined that a separately patch needs to be sent, then I
> > will remove this patch in V8 series?
> >
> > Doug Anderson 于2024年5月16日周四 0
Hi,
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 12:21 AM Cong Yang
wrote:
>
> Discussion with Doug and Linus in V1, we need a
> separate driver to enable the hx83102 controller.
>
> So this series this series mainly Break out as separate driver
> for Starry-himax83102-j02 panels from boe tv101wum driver.
>
> Then
Hi,
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 2:16 PM wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 15/05/2024 03:46, Cong Yang wrote:
> > DRM_PANEL_HIMAX_HX83102 is being split out from DRM_PANEL_BOE_TV101WUM_NL6.
> > Since the arm64 defconfig had the BOE panel driver enabled, let's also
> > enable the himax driver.
> >
> >
Hi,
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 6:47 PM Cong Yang
wrote:
>
> +static int hx83102_prepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
> +{
> + struct hx83102 *ctx = panel_to_hx83102(panel);
> + struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = ctx->dsi;
> + struct device *dev = >dev;
> + int ret;
> +
> +
Hi,
On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 4:00 PM Dmitry Baryshkov
wrote:
>
> Follow the pattern of mipi_dsi_dcs_*_multi() and wrap several existing
> MIPI DSI functions to use the context for processing. This simplifies
> and streamlines driver code to use simpler code pattern.
>
> Note, msleep function is
Hi,
On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 7:13 PM Cong Yang
wrote:
>
> The BOE nv110wum-l60 is a 11.0" WUXGA TFT LCD panel, use hx83102 controller
> which fits in nicely with the existing panel-himax-hx83102 driver. Hence,
> we add a new compatible with panel specific config.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Yang
>
Hi,
On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 7:14 PM Cong Yang
wrote:
>
> The IVO t109nw41 is a 11.0" WUXGA TFT LCD panel, use hx83102 controller
> which fits in nicely with the existing panel-himax-hx83102 driver. Hence,
> we add a new compatible with panel specific config.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Yang
> ---
>
Hi,
On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 7:13 PM Cong Yang
wrote:
>
> +static int hx83102_prepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
> +{
> + struct hx83102 *ctx = panel_to_hx83102(panel);
> + struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = ctx->dsi;
> + struct device *dev = >dev;
> + int ret;
> +
> +
Hi,
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 2:30 AM Maxime Ripard wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 01:51:46PM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > Through a cooperative effort between Hsin-Yi Wang and Dmitry
> > Baryshkov, we have realized the dev_err() in the
> > mipi_dsi_*_write_seq() macros was
Hi,
On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 3:25 PM Dmitry Baryshkov
wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 02:47:05PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 3:37 PM Dmitry Baryshkov
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Add missing error handling for th
Hi,
On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 3:37 PM Dmitry Baryshkov
wrote:
>
> Use newer mipi_dsi_*_multi() functions in order to simplify and cleanup
> panel's prepare() and unprepare() functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-lg-sw43408.c | 95
>
Hi,
On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 3:37 PM Dmitry Baryshkov
wrote:
>
> Add missing error handling for the mipi_dsi_ functions that actually
> return error code instead of silently ignoring it.
>
> Fixes: 069a6c0e94f9 ("drm: panel: Add LG sw43408 panel driver")
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov
> ---
>
Hi,
On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 3:37 PM Dmitry Baryshkov
wrote:
>
> Remove conditional code and always use mipi_dsi_dcs_*multi() wrappers to
> simplify driver's init/exit code. This also includes passing context to
> the init_sequence() function instead of passing the DSI device.
>
> Signed-off-by:
Hi,
On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 3:37 PM Dmitry Baryshkov
wrote:
>
> Remove conditional code and use mipi_dsi_dcs_nop_multi() wrapper to
> simplify driver code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-innolux-p079zca.c | 9 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+),
Hi,
On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 3:37 PM Dmitry Baryshkov
wrote:
>
> @@ -424,20 +420,14 @@ static inline struct ili9882t *to_ili9882t(struct
> drm_panel *panel)
>
> static int ili9882t_enter_sleep_mode(struct ili9882t *ili)
> {
> - struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = ili->dsi;
> - int ret;
>
Hi,
On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 3:37 PM Dmitry Baryshkov
wrote:
>
> Remove conditional code and always use mipi_dsi_dcs_*multi() wrappers to
> simplify driver's init/exit code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-boe-tv101wum-nl6.c | 73
>
Hi,
On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 3:37 PM Dmitry Baryshkov
wrote:
>
> +/**
> + * mipi_dsi_compression_mode_ext() - enable/disable DSC on the peripheral
> + * @ctx: Context for multiple DSI transactions
> + * @enable: Whether to enable or disable the DSC
> + * @algo: Selected compression algorithm
> + *
Hi,
On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 11:05 PM cong yang
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Doug Anderson 于2024年5月10日周五 00:49写道：
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 6:53 PM Cong Yang
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > +static int ivo_t109nw41_init(struct hx8310
Hi,
On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 6:53 PM Cong Yang
wrote:
>
> +static int hx83102_enable(struct drm_panel *panel)
> +{
> + struct hx83102 *ctx = panel_to_hx83102(panel);
> + struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = ctx->dsi;
> + struct device *dev = >dev;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret =
Hi,
On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 6:53 PM Cong Yang
wrote:
>
> +static int ivo_t109nw41_init(struct hx83102 *ctx)
> +{
> + struct mipi_dsi_multi_context dsi_ctx = { .dsi = ctx->dsi };
> +
> + msleep(60);
> +
> + hx83102_enable_extended_cmds(_ctx, true);
> +
Hi,
On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 11:43 PM Zhaoxiong Lv
wrote:
>
> From: lvzhaoxiong
>
> ILI2900 requires reset to pull down time greater than 10ms,
> so the configuration post_power_delay_ms is 10, and the chipset
> initial time is required to be greater than 100ms,
> so the
Hi,
On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 1:35 AM Zhaoxiong Lv
wrote:
>
> Add bindings and driver for starry.
> ---
> Modifications between V1 and V2:
> Kconfig and Makefile configurations added for starry driver
>
> ---
>
> Zhaoxiong Lv (2):
> dt-bindings: display: panel: Add Starry-er88577 support
>
Hi,
On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 4:05 PM Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>
> Since commit 5acf49119630 ("drm/msm: import gen_header.py script from Mesa"),
> compilation is broken on machines having python versions older than 3.9
> due to dependency on argparse.BooleanOptionalAction.
>
> Switch to use simple bool
Hi,
On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 11:15 AM Dmitry Baryshkov
wrote:
>
> @@ -941,6 +948,7 @@ def main():
> parser = argparse.ArgumentParser()
> parser.add_argument('--rnn', type=str, required=True)
> parser.add_argument('--xml', type=str, required=True)
> +
Hi,
On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 11:52 PM Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 11:36 PM Douglas Anderson
> wrote:
>
> > As talked about in commit d2aacaf07395 ("drm/panel: Check for already
> > prepared/enabled in drm_panel"), we want to remove needless code from
> > panel drivers that
Hi,
On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 4:52 AM cong yang
wrote:
>
> > > +static int starry_himax83102_j02_init(struct hx83102 *ctx)
> > > +{
> > > + struct mipi_dsi_multi_context dsi_ctx = { .dsi = ctx->dsi };
> > > +
> > > + hx83102_enable_extended_cmds(ctx, true);
> > > +
Hi,
On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 6:53 AM Cong Yang
wrote:
>
> +static int boe_nv110wum_init(struct hx83102 *ctx)
> +{
> + struct mipi_dsi_multi_context dsi_ctx = { .dsi = ctx->dsi };
> +
> + msleep(60);
> +
> + hx83102_enable_extended_cmds(ctx, true);
> +
Hi,
On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 6:53 AM Cong Yang
wrote:
>
> +static int hx83102_enable_extended_cmds(struct hx83102 *ctx, bool enable)
> +{
> + struct mipi_dsi_multi_context dsi_ctx = { .dsi = ctx->dsi };
> +
> + if (enable)
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(_ctx,
Hi,
On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 8:14 AM Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 07 May 2024 21:52:28 +0800, Cong Yang wrote:
> > In V1, discussed with Doug and Linus [1], we need break out as separate
> > driver for the himax83102-j02 controller. Beacuse "starry,himax83102-j02"
> > and in this series
Hi,
On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 6:44 AM cong yang
wrote:
>
> > Speaking of which, some of the panels that you add to this driver seem
> > to disable extended commands at the end of their init sequence, but
> > this one doesn't. Should it?
>
> I have confirmed with himax that disable extended
Hi,
On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 3:33 PM Douglas Anderson wrote:
>
> The debug print clearly lacks a \n at the end. Add it.
>
> Fixes: 8f86c82aba8b ("drm/connector: demote connector force-probes for
> non-master clients")
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson
> ---
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c |
Hi,
On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 4:55 PM Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 4:48 PM Douglas Anderson wrote:
> >
> > As evidenced by in-field reports, this panel shipped on pompom but we
> > never added the ID and thus we're stuck w/ conservative timings. The
> > panel was part of early
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 6:55 PM Xuxin Xiong
wrote:
>
> Hi Doug, thank you!
> We had reported this info to the CSOT to correct the vendor id.
> If they confirm to fix this with the same product ID, we will submit a
> patch to fix this.
FYI, "top posting" like this is generally frowned upon
Hi,
On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 7:04 AM Quentin Schulz wrote:
>
> Hi Douglas,
>
> On 5/3/24 11:32 PM, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > [You don't often get email from diand...@chromium.org. Learn why this is
> > important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
> >
> > It's the responsibility
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 9:35 AM Doug Anderson wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 5:40 AM Laurent Pinchart
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 02:31:24PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 1:16 PM Laurent Pinchart
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 3:08 AM Dmitry Baryshkov
wrote:
>
> Use .init_load_uA part of the bulk regulator API instead of calling
> register_set_load() manually.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-novatek-nt36672a.c | 11 +++
> 1 file changed, 3
Hi,
On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 8:43 AM Douglas Anderson wrote:
>
> @@ -132,33 +125,9 @@ static int innolux_panel_prepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
> /* p079zca: t4, p097pfg: t5 */
> usleep_range(2, 21000);
>
> - if (innolux->desc->init_cmds) {
> - const struct
Hi,
On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 1:23 AM Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 5:43 PM Douglas Anderson wrote:
>
> > Through a cooperative effort between Hsin-Yi Wang and Dmitry
> > Baryshkov, we have realized the dev_err() in the
> > mipi_dsi_*_write_seq() macros was causing quite a bit of
Hi,
On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 6:42 AM Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 5:43 PM Douglas Anderson wrote:
>
> > Consensus on the mailing lists is that panels shouldn't use a table of
> > init commands but should instead use init functions. With the recently
> > introduced
Hi,
On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 12:48 AM Neil Armstrong
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 01/05/2024 17:41, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > The consensus of many DRM folks is that we want to move away from DSI
> > drivers defining tables of init commands. Instead, we want to move to
> > init functions that can use
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 10:13 PM Sui Jingfeng wrote:
>
> Having conditional around the of_node pointer of the drm_bridge structure
> is not necessary anymore, since drm_bridge structure always has the of_node
> member since the commit d8dfccde2709 ("drm/bridge: Drop conditionals around
>
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 8:39 AM Jani Nikula wrote:
>
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2024, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 2:38 AM Neil Armstrong
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> > +/**
> >> > + * struct mipi_dsi_multi_con
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 6:16 PM 隋景峰 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> > -原始邮件-
> > 发件人: "Maxime Ripard"
> > 发送时间: 2024-04-29 19:30:24 (星期一)
> > 收件人: "Sui Jingfeng"
> > 抄送: "Sui Jingfeng" , "Maarten Lankhorst"
> > , "Thomas Zimmermann"
> > , "David Airlie" , "Daniel Vetter"
> > , "Douglas
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 7:30 PM Cong Yang
wrote:
>
> The Starry HX83102 based mipi panel should never have been part of the boe
> tv101wum driver. Discussion with Doug and Linus in V1 [1], we need a
> separate driver to enable the hx83102 controller.
>
> In hx83102 driver, add DSI commands
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 11:22 PM Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 04:44:33AM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Sat, 27 Apr 2024 at 02:59, Douglas Anderson
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > The mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq() macro makes a call to
> > > mipi_dsi_dcs_write_buffer() which
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 2:38 AM Neil Armstrong
wrote:
>
> > +/**
> > + * struct mipi_dsi_multi_context - Context to call multiple MIPI DSI funcs
> > in a row
> > + * @dsi: Pointer to the MIPI DSI device
> > + * @accum_err: Storage for the accumulated error over the multiple calls.
> > Init
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 11:33 PM Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> > ---
> > Right now this patch introduces two new functions in
> > drm_mipi_dsi.c. Alternatively we could have changed the prototype of
> > the "chatty" functions and made the deprecated macros adapt to the new
> > prototype. While
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 8:28 AM Doug Anderson wrote:
>
> > I don't find this unintuitive, but if it helps, you could conceivably
> > add a context parameter:
> >
> > struct mipi_dsi_seq_context context = {
>
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 8:03 PM Dmitry Baryshkov
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 10:04:49AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 1:19 AM Jani Nikula
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > @@ -279,6 +281,8 @@ enu
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 3:09 AM Jani Nikula wrote:
>
> > 2. Accept that a slightly less efficient handling of the error case
> > and perhaps a less intuitive API, but avoid the goto.
> >
> > Essentially you could pass in "ret" and have the function be a no-op
> > if an error is already
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 1:19 AM Jani Nikula wrote:
>
> > @@ -279,6 +281,8 @@ enum mipi_dsi_dcs_tear_mode {
> >
> > ssize_t mipi_dsi_dcs_write_buffer(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi,
> > const void *data, size_t len);
> > +ssize_t
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 4:37 PM Dmitry Baryshkov
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 at 02:25, Doug Anderson wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 3:51 PM Dmitry Baryshkov
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 at 01:15, Hsi
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 3:51 PM Dmitry Baryshkov
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 at 01:15, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 2:49 PM Dmitry Baryshkov
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 at 00:04, Doug Anderson wrote:
>
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 7:42 PM cong yang
wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Thanks reply.
>
> Doug Anderson 于2024年4月24日周三 00:26写道：
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 2:37 AM cong yang
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > > +static int starr
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 2:49 PM Dmitry Baryshkov
wrote:
>
> > The problem is that with these panels that need big init sequences the
> > code based solution is _a lot_ bigger. If it were a few bytes or a
> > 1-2KB then fine, but when Hsin-Yi measured Linus W's attempt to move
> > from a
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 2:20 PM Dmitry Baryshkov
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 01:41:59PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 11:10 AM Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > > +#define _INIT_DCS
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 11:10 AM Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
>
> > > > > +#define _INIT_DCS_CMD(...) { \
> > > > > + .type = INIT_DCS_CMD, \
> > > > > + .len = sizeof((char[]){__VA_ARGS__}), \
> > > > > + .data = (char[]){__VA_ARGS__} }
> > > > > +
> > > > > +#define _INIT_DELAY_CMD(...)
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 6:28 PM Xuxin Xiong
wrote:
>
> Yes, I read the edid from the panels, one is CSO and the other is CSW.
> The details are as follows, please help check. Thank you!
>
>
> 1. MNC207QS1-1
> edid-decode (hex):
> 00 ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 0e 6f 00 12 e7 00 00 00
> 1e 21 01 04
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 2:37 AM cong yang
wrote:
>
> > > +static int starry_init_cmd(struct hx83102 *ctx)
> > > +{
> > > + struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = ctx->dsi;
> > > +
> > > + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, HX83102_SETEXTC, 0x83, 0x10, 0x21,
> > > 0x55, 0x00);
> > > +
> > > +
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 2:03 AM Cong Yang
wrote:
>
> DRM_PANEL_HIMAX_HX83102 is being split out from DRM_PANEL_BOE_TV101WUM_NL6.
> Since the arm64 defconfig had the BOE panel driver enabled, let's also
> enable the himax driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Yang
> ---
>
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 2:03 AM Cong Yang
wrote:
>
> The Starry HX83102 based mipi panel should never have been part of the boe
> tv101wum driver. Discussion with Doug and Linus in V1 [1], we need a
> separate driver to enable the hx83102 controller.
>
> In hx83102 driver, add DSI commands
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 8:14 AM Rob Herring wrote:
>
> > +additionalProperties: false
>
> Perhaps 'unevaluatedProperties' instead. Don't you want to support
> standard properties such as width-mm/height-mm?
For at least those two properties, it looks like the answer is "no".
>From reading
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 11:09 PM Xuxin Xiong
wrote:
>
> Add support for the following panel:
> CSOT MNB601LS1-1
>
> Signed-off-by: Xuxin Xiong
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c
>
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 5:48 AM lvzhaoxiong
wrote:
>
> ILI2900 requires reset to pull down time greater than 10ms,
> so the configuration post_power_delay_ms is 10, and the chipset
> initial time is required to be greater than 100ms,
> so the post_gpio_reset_on_delay_ms is set to 100.
>
>
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 12:15 AM Cong Yang
wrote:
>
> The BOE nv110wum-l60 is a 11.0" WUXGA TFT LCD panel, which fits in nicely
> with the existing panel-boe-tv101wum-nl6 driver. Hence, we add a new
> compatible with panel specific config.
I guess we have the same question we've had with
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 4:42 AM Jayesh Choudhary wrote:
>
> Hello Doug,
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> On 08/04/24 14:33, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 12:36 AM Jayesh Choudhary wrote:
> >>
> >> Due to i
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 10:33 AM Rob Herring wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 16:52:48 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> > The ITE IT6505 display bridge can take one I2S input and transmit it
> > over the DisplayPort link.
> >
> > Add #sound-dai-cells (= 0) to the binding for it.
> >
> >
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 12:36 AM Jayesh Choudhary wrote:
>
> Due to integer calculations, the rounding off can cause errors in the final
> value propagated in the registers.
> Considering the example of 1080p (very common resolution), the mode->clock
> is 148500, dsi->lanes = 4, and bpp = 24,
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 5:07 PM Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 2:57 PM Douglas Anderson
> wrote:
> >
> > If we're using the AUX channel for eDP backlight and it fails to probe
> > for some reason, let's _not_ fail the panel probe.
> >
> > At least one case where we could
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 5:05 PM Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 2:57 PM Douglas Anderson
> wrote:
> >
> > If at boot we fail to power up the eDP panel (most often happens if
> > the eDP panel never asserts HPD to us) or if we are unable to read the
> > EDID at bootup to
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 4:52 PM Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 2:56 PM Douglas Anderson
> wrote:
> >
> > If we're using the generic "edp-panel" compatible string and we fail
> > to detect an eDP panel then we fall back to conservative timings for
> > powering up and
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 5:47 AM Dmitry Baryshkov
wrote:
>
> Both dp_link_adjust_levels() and dp_ctrl_update_vx_px() limit swing and
> pre-emphasis to 2, while the real maximum value for the sum of the
> voltage swing and pre-emphasis is 3. Fix the DP code to remove this
> limitation.
>
>
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 3:45 PM Dmitry Baryshkov
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 at 22:58, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> >
> > In response to my patch removing the "wait for HPD" logic at the
> > beginning of the MSM DP transfer() callback [1], we had some debate
> > about what the "This is an
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 7:05 PM Emilio Mendoza Reyes
wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> From: Emilio Mendoza Reyes
>
> The patch ("drm/panel: Check for already prepared/enabled in drm_panel")
> moved checking for (en/dis)abled and [un]prepared panels before
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 5:59 AM Pin-yen Lin wrote:
>
> Add support for the AUO B120XAN01.0 panel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pin-yen Lin
> ---
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Looks fine.
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson
Applied to drm-misc-next:
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 10:15 AM kernel test robot wrote:
>
> tree: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-tip drm-tip
> head: 657dd8fcd2f1d1205c6f98fdb8b60915228991d1
> commit: 0885186926a13c697d78f5af03f32445414b6ad5 [4/11] Merge remote-tracking
> branch 'drm-misc/drm-misc-next' into
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 3:32 PM Jessica Zhang wrote:
>
> On 3/13/2024 2:12 PM, Douglas Anderson via B4 Relay wrote:
> > From: Douglas Anderson
> >
> > When the atna33xc20 driver was first written the resume code never
> > returned an error. If there was a problem waiting for HPD it just
> >
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 1:55 PM Dmitry Baryshkov
wrote:
>
> > -* panel to finish powering on. This is an optional function.
> > +* panel to finish powering on. It is optional for DP AUX
> > controllers
> > +* to implement this function but
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 10:27 AM Dmitry Baryshkov
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 at 19:13, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 3/18/2024 5:55 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 at 02:19, Abhinav Kumar
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> +bjorn, johan as fyi for sc8280xp
> >
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 12:26 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> Quoting Douglas Anderson (2024-03-15 14:36:32)
> > This is a no-op change to just fix a typo in the name of a static function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson
> > ---
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - ("Fix typo in static function
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 1:41 PM Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>
>
>
> On 3/12/2024 5:13 PM, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > As documented in the description of the transfer() function of
> > "struct drm_dp_aux", the transfer() function can be called at any time
> > regardless of the state of the DP port.
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 3:07 PM Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
>
> This series is a follow up for 1a5e81de180e ("Revert "drm/panel-edp: Add
> auo_b116xa3_mode""). It's found that 2 different AUO panels use the same
> product id. One of them requires an overridden mode, while the other should
> use the
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 1:37 AM Colin Ian King wrote:
>
> The variable out is being initialized and incremented but it is never
> actually referenced in any other way. The variable is redundant and can
> be removed.
>
> Cleans up clang scan build warning:
>
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 5:47 PM Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 5:14 PM Douglas Anderson
> wrote:
> >
> > As documented in the description of the transfer() function of
> > "struct drm_dp_aux", the transfer() function can be called at any time
> > regardless of the state
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 4:48 PM Xuxin Xiong
wrote:
>
> Add support for the following 2 panels:
> 1. BOE NT116WHM-N44
> 2. CMN N116BCA-EA1
>
> Signed-off-by: Xuxin Xiong
> Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson
It's fine this time, but please be careful in the future. I never
actually gave you my
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 12:07 AM Jani Nikula wrote:
>
> On Thu, 07 Mar 2024, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
> > Create a type drm_edid_ident as the identity of an EDID. Currently it
> > contains panel id and monitor name.
> >
> > Create a function that can match a given EDID and an identity:
> > 1.
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 3:07 PM Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
>
> Create a type drm_edid_ident as the identity of an EDID. Currently it
> contains panel id and monitor name.
>
> Create a function that can match a given EDID and an identity:
> 1. Reject if the panel id doesn't match.
> 2. If name is not
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 12:28 PM Jani Nikula wrote:
>
> On Thu, 07 Mar 2024, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 5:28 AM Jani Nikula
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, 06 Mar 2024, Doug Anderson wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 1:44 AM Xuxin Xiong
wrote:
>
> Add support for the following 2 panels:
> 1. BOE NT116WHM-N44
> 2. CMN N116BCA-EA1
>
> Signed-off-by: Xuxin Xiong
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
The patch looks OK, but please resend
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 4:20 PM Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 3:30 PM Doug Anderson wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 12:04 PM Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
> > >
> > > +static void
> > > +match_
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 12:04 PM Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
>
> @@ -1009,6 +1009,19 @@ static const struct panel_desc auo_b101ean01 = {
> },
> };
>
> +static const struct drm_display_mode auo_b116xa3_mode = {
> + .clock = 70589,
> + .hdisplay = 1366,
> + .hsync_start =
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 12:04 PM Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
>
> Currently edid quirks are matched by panel id only.
>
> Modify it to match with identity so it's easier to be extended
> for more complex matching if required.
>
> Suggested-by: Jani Nikula
> Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang
> Reviewed-by:
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 12:04 PM Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
>
> @@ -2111,15 +2113,16 @@ static const struct edp_panel_entry edp_panels[] = {
> { /* sentinal */ }
> };
>
> -static const struct edp_panel_entry *find_edp_panel(u32 panel_id)
> +static const struct edp_panel_entry
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 12:04 PM Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
>
> +static void
> +match_identity(const struct detailed_timing *timing, void *data)
> +{
> + struct drm_edid_match_closure *closure = data;
> + unsigned int i;
> + const char *name = closure->ident->name;
> +
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 12:04 PM Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
>
> drm_edid_get_panel_id() now just directly call edid_extract_panel_id().
>
> Merge them into one function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang
> ---
> v4->v5: new
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 39
1 - 100 of 1319 matches
Mail list logo
