On 09/11/2023 02:39, Mina Almasry wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 7:36 AM Edward Cree wrote:
>> If not then surely the way to return a memory area
>> in an io_uring idiom is just to post a new read sqe ('RX descriptor')
>> pointing into it, rather than explicitly returni
On 06/11/2023 21:17, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> I guess I'm just wondering whether other people have any suggestions
> here. Not sure Jonathan's way was better, but we fundamentally
> have two queues between the kernel and the userspace:
> - userspace receiving tokens (recvmsg + magical flag)
> -
> On Fri, 2021-05-14 at 10:21 +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> I do use a lot of UTF-8 here, as I type texts in Portuguese, but I rely
>> on the US-intl keyboard settings, that allow me to type as "'a" for á.
>> However, there's no shortcut for non-Latin UTF-codes, as far as I know.
>>
>>
On 10/05/2021 14:38, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Mon, 10 May 2021 14:16:16 +0100
> Edward Cree escreveu:
>> But what kinds of things with × or — in are going to be grept for?
>
> Actually, on almost all places, those aren't used inside math formulae, but
> instead, the
On 10/05/2021 14:59, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> Most of these
> UTF-8 characters come from latex conversions and really aren't
> necessary (and are being used incorrectly).
I fully agree with fixing those.
The cover-letter, however, gave the impression that that was not the
main purpose of this
On 10/05/2021 12:55, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> The main point on this series is to replace just the occurrences
> where ASCII represents the symbol equally well
> - U+2014 ('—'): EM DASH
Em dash is not the same thing as hyphen-minus, and the latter does not
serve 'equally well'.
On 25/11/2020 00:32, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> I have said *authoring* lines of *this* kind takes a minute per line.
> Specifically: lines fixing the fallthrough warning mechanically and
> repeatedly where the compiler tells you to, and doing so full-time for
> a month.
> It is useful since it makes
On 24/11/2020 21:25, Kees Cook wrote:
> I still think this isn't right -- it's a case statement that runs off
> the end without an explicit flow control determination.
Proves too much — for instance
case foo:
case bar:
thing;
break;
doesn't require a fallthrough; after
