On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 10:36:57PM -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 10:31:18PM -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 12:25:23PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 22:07 -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > >
> > > > So in the
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 02:12:16PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Mit, 2011-04-13 at 09:59 +0200, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 07:29:22PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > > On Die, 2011-04-12 at 14:00 +0200, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> > > > On T
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:59:14AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Uwe Kleine-K?nig writes:
>
> > $ git name-rev --refs=refs/tags/v2.6\*
> > 69a07f0b117a40fcc1a479358d8e1f41793617f2
> > 69a07f0b117a40fcc1a479358d8e1f41793617f2 tags/v2.6.39-rc2~3^2~43^2~4
> >
> > so it was introduced just before
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 06:16:13PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 09:59 +0200, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> >
> > Well, X is dead, or rather in an infinite ioctl loop as described
> > above.
> > IIRC, the display enters a power-down mode and
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 01:46:10PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> BTW, if your kernel contains commit
> 69a07f0b117a40fcc1a479358d8e1f41793617f2, can you try if reverting that
> helps?
My kernel is pristine 2.6.38 and does not include this commit
(was introduced before 2.6.39-rc1 according to
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 07:29:22PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Die, 2011-04-12 at 14:00 +0200, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 01:46:10PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > > >
> > > > With no_wb=1 the driver goes a bit further but the X serv
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 07:29:22PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Die, 2011-04-12 at 14:00 +0200, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 01:46:10PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
With no_wb=1 the driver goes a bit further but the X server ends
up in an infinite ioctl loop
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 01:46:10PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
BTW, if your kernel contains commit
69a07f0b117a40fcc1a479358d8e1f41793617f2, can you try if reverting that
helps?
My kernel is pristine 2.6.38 and does not include this commit
(was introduced before 2.6.39-rc1 according to gitk).
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 06:16:13PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 09:59 +0200, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
Well, X is dead, or rather in an infinite ioctl loop as described
above.
IIRC, the display enters a power-down mode and there is nothing to
see.
So
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:59:14AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Uwe Kleine-König u.kleine-koe...@pengutronix.de writes:
$ git name-rev --refs=refs/tags/v2.6\*
69a07f0b117a40fcc1a479358d8e1f41793617f2
69a07f0b117a40fcc1a479358d8e1f41793617f2 tags/v2.6.39-rc2~3^2~43^2~4
so it was
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 02:12:16PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mit, 2011-04-13 at 09:59 +0200, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 07:29:22PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Die, 2011-04-12 at 14:00 +0200, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 01:46:10PM +0200
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 01:46:10PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> >
> > With no_wb=1 the driver goes a bit further but the X server ends
> > up in an infinite ioctl loop and the logs are:
>
> Which ioctl does it loop on? Please provide the Xorg.0.log file as well.
Hi Micel,
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 05:32:43PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> [ Adding the dri-devel list ]
>
> Have you ruled out any MSI related problems? I think the IRQ not working
> could explain the symptoms...
Booting with MSI disabled does not change anything. Actually on this
Hi Micel,
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 05:32:43PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
[ Adding the dri-devel list ]
Have you ruled out any MSI related problems? I think the IRQ not working
could explain the symptoms...
Booting with MSI disabled does not change anything. Actually on this
machine
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 01:46:10PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
With no_wb=1 the driver goes a bit further but the X server ends
up in an infinite ioctl loop and the logs are:
Which ioctl does it loop on? Please provide the Xorg.0.log file as well.
From memory, the code was 0x64, which
15 matches
Mail list logo
