On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 09:51:46AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Luca Tettamanti
> wrote:
> > Any printk between evergreen_mc_stop and evergreen_mc_resume locks up
> > the machine. The likely culprit is commit 023e188e:
>
> yeah, vram is
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 09:51:46AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com wrote:
Any printk between evergreen_mc_stop and evergreen_mc_resume locks up
the machine. The likely culprit is commit 023e188e:
yeah, vram is locked out
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:24:01AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > I just tested the rebased acpi_patches branch: ACPI part works fine, but
> > I see a big slow down during radeon driver initialization when the
> > screen goes black for a couple of seconds (with 3.5.0 + acpi patches the
> > screen
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:51:10AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> I've gathered up the various outstanding radeon patches and put them
> up in a tree for testing:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux/log/?h=drm-next-3.7-wip
> Some of these may end up in -fixes, but most of them are -next
>
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:24:01AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
I just tested the rebased acpi_patches branch: ACPI part works fine, but
I see a big slow down during radeon driver initialization when the
screen goes black for a couple of seconds (with 3.5.0 + acpi patches the
screen just
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> I admit I'm not really an ACPI expert, but thinking about this more,
> I'm wondering if maybe we should just send the appropriate brightness
> change, switch display, etc. event to userspace rather than handling
> it directly in the radeon
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 08:45:30AM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> On ?, 2012-08-01 at 15:49 +0200, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> > AMD ACPI interface may overload the standard event
> > ACPI_VIDEO_NOTIFY_PROBE (0x81) to signal AMD-specific events. In such
> > cases we don't want
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 08:45:30AM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
On 三, 2012-08-01 at 15:49 +0200, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
AMD ACPI interface may overload the standard event
ACPI_VIDEO_NOTIFY_PROBE (0x81) to signal AMD-specific events. In such
cases we don't want to send the keypress
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote:
I admit I'm not really an ACPI expert, but thinking about this more,
I'm wondering if maybe we should just send the appropriate brightness
change, switch display, etc. event to userspace rather than handling
it directly
usually changes the
display configuration and messes up a dual-screen setup).
This patch gives the radeon driver the chance to examine the event and
block the keypress if the event is an "AMD event".
Signed-off-by: Luca Tettamanti
---
Any comment from ACPI front?
drivers/ac
k.
Looks ok, I lost one fix along the road though, I'm attaching the patch.
Luca
-- next part --
>From 0f71d5b56b9e5eee3194b5b926767511281ea0a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Luca Tettamanti <kronos...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 10:53:19 +0200
Subject: [P
lost one fix along the road though, I'm attaching the patch.
Luca
From 0f71d5b56b9e5eee3194b5b926767511281ea0a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 10:53:19 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] drm/radeon: fix, enable notifications with device specific
command
usually changes the
display configuration and messes up a dual-screen setup).
This patch gives the radeon driver the chance to examine the event and
block the keypress if the event is an AMD event.
Signed-off-by: Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com
---
Any comment from ACPI front?
drivers/acpi
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 09:58:04AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 5:16 AM, Luca Tettamanti
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Alex Deucher
> > wrote:
> >> Regarding patches 3 and 4, it might be easier to just store a pointer
> &
I'm putting back the CC and adding Alex.
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Pali Roh?r wrote:
> Thanks, now working. When I write to acpi video brightness file
> it change brightness and in dmesg is:
>
> [ 47.200998] [drm:radeon_atif_handler], event, device_class =
> video, type = 0xd0
> [
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Pali Roh?r wrote:
> Hello, I have some good news. Radeon patches from this post
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2012-July/025535.html
> export brightness file /sys/class/backlight/radeon_bl/brightness
> And finally with these patches I'm able to
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> Regarding patches 3 and 4, it might be easier to just store a pointer
> to the relevant encoder when you verify ATIF rather than walking the
> encoder list every time.
Makes sense, I was unsure about the lifetime of the encoders, but
AFAICS
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote:
Regarding patches 3 and 4, it might be easier to just store a pointer
to the relevant encoder when you verify ATIF rather than walking the
encoder list every time.
Makes sense, I was unsure about the lifetime of the
I'm putting back the CC and adding Alex.
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, now working. When I write to acpi video brightness file
it change brightness and in dmesg is:
[ 47.200998] [drm:radeon_atif_handler], event, device_class =
video, type =
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 09:58:04AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 5:16 AM, Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com
wrote:
Regarding patches 3 and 4, it might be easier to just store a pointer
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:30 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Luca Tettamanti
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:20:15AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>> Supported DWORD Bit vector providing supported functions
>>> information. Ea
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:20:15AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Luca Tettamanti
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 05:29:25PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Luca Tettamanti
> >> wrote:
> &g
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 04:32:47PM +0800, joeyli wrote:
> ? ??2012-07-29 ? 15:10 +0200?Luca Tettamanti ???
> > On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 11:51:48AM +0800, joeyli wrote:
> > > Hi Luca,
> > >
> > > ? ??2012-07-28 ? 16:56 +0200?Luca Tettamanti ???
> > &g
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 04:32:47PM +0800, joeyli wrote:
於 日，2012-07-29 於 15:10 +0200，Luca Tettamanti 提到：
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 11:51:48AM +0800, joeyli wrote:
Hi Luca,
於 六，2012-07-28 於 16:56 +0200，Luca Tettamanti 提到：
I just found the first problem (probably a BIOS bug
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:20:15AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 05:29:25PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com
wrote:
I just
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:30 PM, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:20:15AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
Supported DWORD Bit vector providing supported functions
information. Each
Hi,
I'm attaching a first draft of my work. The first 3 patches are
infrastructure work, the fourth wires the notification handler and
retrieves the requests from the system BIOS, but it does not actually
change brightness yet.
The problem here is how to get the correct encoder: should I just
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 11:51:48AM +0800, joeyli wrote:
> Hi Luca,
>
> ? ??2012-07-28 ? 16:56 +0200?Luca Tettamanti ???
> > I just found the first problem (probably a BIOS bug):
> > ATIF_FUNCTION_GET_SYSTEM_PARAMETERS is implemented in the DSDT, but the
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 05:29:25PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Luca Tettamanti
> wrote:
> > I just found the first problem (probably a BIOS bug):
> > ATIF_FUNCTION_GET_SYSTEM_PARAMETERS is implemented in the DSDT, but the
>
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 05:29:25PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com wrote:
I just found the first problem (probably a BIOS bug):
ATIF_FUNCTION_GET_SYSTEM_PARAMETERS is implemented in the DSDT, but the
corresponding bit
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 11:51:48AM +0800, joeyli wrote:
Hi Luca,
於 六，2012-07-28 於 16:56 +0200，Luca Tettamanti 提到：
I just found the first problem (probably a BIOS bug):
ATIF_FUNCTION_GET_SYSTEM_PARAMETERS is implemented in the DSDT, but the
corresponding bit
arithmetics, but it _might_ make it easier to read past the buffer if
one does not check the size before using the struct. What do you think?
Luca
From e485a3a4075c25ba1747ad61f6168c3734d5f0a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 17:04:43 +0200
Subject
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 03:42:26PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Luca Tettamanti
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:35:25AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Luca Tettamanti
> >> wrote:
>
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 03:42:26PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:35:25AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com
wrote:
The other
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:46:50PM +0800, joeyli wrote:
> ? ??2012-07-26 ? 23:31 -0400?Alex Deucher ???
> > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:50 PM, joeyli wrote:
> > > ? ??2012-07-26 ? 14:58 +0200?Luca Tettamanti ???
> > >> - again ACPI video module gets
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:46:50PM +0800, joeyli wrote:
於 四，2012-07-26 於 23:31 -0400，Alex Deucher 提到：
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:50 PM, joeyli j...@suse.com wrote:
於 四，2012-07-26 於 14:58 +0200，Luca Tettamanti 提到：
- again ACPI video module gets the nodification (in this case
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:35:25AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Luca Tettamanti
> wrote:
> > The other missing bit is how to actually change the brightness... Alex,
> > do you know what registers to poke?
>
> You need to check if the GP
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 01:38:09PM -0400, alexdeucher at gmail.com wrote:
> From: Alex Deucher
>
> Add a new header that defines the AMD ACPI interface used
> for laptops, PowerXpress, and chipset specific functionality
> and update the current code to use it.
Great! Now my DSDT makes sense ;)
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 01:38:09PM -0400, alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Alex Deucher alexander.deuc...@amd.com
Add a new header that defines the AMD ACPI interface used
for laptops, PowerXpress, and chipset specific functionality
and update the current code to use it.
Great! Now my
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:35:25AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com wrote:
The other missing bit is how to actually change the brightness... Alex,
do you know what registers to poke?
You need to check if the GPU controls
Hello,
I'm trying to figure out how to control the brightness of the screen of my
laptop, a Toshiba L885-10W.
The ACPI DSDT table contains the standard control methods, the setter (_BCM),
however, only sets a value in the record returned by ATIF method and send out a
notification:
Hello,
I'm trying to figure out how to control the brightness of the screen of my
laptop, a Toshiba L885-10W.
The ACPI DSDT table contains the standard control methods, the setter (_BCM),
however, only sets a value in the record returned by ATIF method and send out a
notification:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Maarten Maathuis
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Dmitry Torokhov
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:33:50AM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote:
>>> On 2012-04-28 02:19 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Nick Bowler >> >
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Maarten Maathuis madman2...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Dmitry Torokhov
dmitry.torok...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:33:50AM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote:
On 2012-04-28 02:19 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012
Hi Jerome,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:03 PM, wrote:
> From: Jerome Glisse
>
> This add a command buffer dumping facilities, that will
> dump command buffer and all associated bo that most likely
> triggered a lockup.
[cut]
I spotted this:
> +void radeon_fence_blob_faulty_ib(struct
Hi Jerome,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:03 PM, j.gli...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Jerome Glisse jgli...@redhat.com
This add a command buffer dumping facilities, that will
dump command buffer and all associated bo that most likely
triggered a lockup.
[cut]
I spotted this:
+void
Hi Rob,
I've a couple of (minor) comments:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 01:00:36PM -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/omap/omap_drm.c
[...]
> +/* allocate a new (un-tiled) buffer object */
> +struct omap_bo * omap_bo_new(struct omap_device *dev,
> + uint32_t size, uint32_t
Hi Rob,
I've a couple of (minor) comments:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 01:00:36PM -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
--- /dev/null
+++ b/omap/omap_drm.c
[...]
+/* allocate a new (un-tiled) buffer object */
+struct omap_bo * omap_bo_new(struct omap_device *dev,
+ uint32_t size, uint32_t flags)
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> Seems to cause problems on certain laptops
>
> Fixes:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24462
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
Tested-by: Luca Tettamanti
> ---
> ?drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atombios_crtc.
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote:
Seems to cause problems on certain laptops
Fixes:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24462
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com
Tested-by: Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com
---
drivers/gpu
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Smatch thinks there is a buffer overflow in nvc0_instmem_suspend() and
> I've looked at it, but I don't understand the code.
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvc0_instmem.c +152 nvc0_instmem_suspend(10)
> ? ? ? ?error: buffer overflow
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Luca Tettamanti
> wrote:
>> Hi Arnd,
>> this commit:
>>
>> commit 58374713c9dfb4d231f8c56cac089f6fbdedc2ec
>> Author: Arnd Bergmann
>> Date: ? Sat Jul 10 23:51
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Arnd,
this commit:
commit 58374713c9dfb4d231f8c56cac089f6fbdedc2ec
Author: Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de
Date: Sat Jul 10 23:51:39 2010 +0200
53 matches
Mail list logo
