On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 01:32:40PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Opregion is one mechanism to provide VBT - it doesn't define it.
Then let me repeat that I haven't seen anything in the VBT tables of
the gma500-using netbook I have that didn't seem to be parsed
correctly by the current gpu/drm/i9
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 01:52:26AM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Now that we've got multiple consumers it's probably not helpful to move
> the (potentially chip-specific) VBT handling to general code. We've got
> zero documentation on how GMA500 handles VBT, and not a great deal more
> for i91
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 01:32:40PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Opregion is one mechanism to provide VBT - it doesn't define it.
Then let me repeat that I haven't seen anything in the VBT tables of
the gma500-using netbook I have that didn't seem to be parsed
correctly by the current gpu/drm/i9
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 01:52:26AM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Now that we've got multiple consumers it's probably not helpful to move
> the (potentially chip-specific) VBT handling to general code. We've got
> zero documentation on how GMA500 handles VBT, and not a great deal more
> for i91
