[PATCH] drm/amdgpu: don't add files at control minor debugfs directory

2016-12-08 Thread Shawn Starr
; > Not sure about the kernel, but in other projects the convention is > > > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98915 > > > >> Fixes: 8a357d10043c ("drm: Nerf DRM_CONTROL nodes") > >> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher > > > > Regardless of the above, > > > > Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer > > Reviewed-by: Christian König . > Worked fine, fixed the issue for me. Tested-by: Shawn Starr > ___ > amd-gfx mailing list > amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

[PATCH 1/3] x86/pat: export io memory reserve/free api.

2016-10-22 Thread Shawn Starr
For the series, no regressions in my testing, no stalls, no issues noted. Tested by: Shawn Starr Thanks, Shawn On Tuesday, October 18, 2016 4:13:11 PM EDT Dave Airlie wrote: > From: Dave Airlie > > These functions are needed for gpu/ttm drivers to reserve the > VRAM area as wr

Re: gm45 intel gfx can generate non-MSI irq# in MSI mode (was Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: stop using GMBUS IRQs on Gen4 chips (was Re: [3.9-rc1] irq 16: nobody cared (was [3.9-rc1] very poor interrupt respo

2013-03-25 Thread Shawn Starr
On Tuesday, March 19, 2013 04:12:18 PM Daniel Vetter wrote: On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk wrote: How about just using: if (!HAS_GMBUS_IRQ(dev_priv-dev)) gmbus4_irq_en = 0; and the existing wait loop? I explicitly wanted to avoid

gm45 intel gfx can generate non-MSI irq# in MSI mode (was Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: stop using GMBUS IRQs on Gen4 chips (was Re: [3.9-rc1] irq 16: nobody cared (was [3.9-rc1] very poor interrupt responses

2013-03-24 Thread Shawn Starr
On Tuesday, March 19, 2013 04:12:18 PM Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > >> > How about just using: > >> > if (!HAS_GMBUS_IRQ(dev_priv->dev)) gmbus4_irq_en = 0; > >> > > >> > and the existing wait loop? > >> > >> I explicitly wanted to avoid

Re: [3.9-rc1] irq 16: nobody cared (was [3.9-rc1] very poor interrupt responses)

2013-03-18 Thread Shawn Starr
On Friday, March 15, 2013 12:14:28 PM Yinghai Lu wrote: On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 8:14 AM, Jiri Kosina jkos...@suse.cz wrote: Just a datapoint -- I have put a trivial debugging patch in place, and it reveals that nobody cared for irq 16 happens long after last I915_WRITE(GMBUS4 +

[3.9-rc1] irq 16: nobody cared (was [3.9-rc1] very poor interrupt responses)

2013-03-17 Thread Shawn Starr
On Friday, March 15, 2013 12:14:28 PM Yinghai Lu wrote: > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 8:14 AM, Jiri Kosina wrote: > > Just a datapoint -- I have put a trivial debugging patch in place, and it > > reveals that "nobody cared" for irq 16 happens long after last > > > > I915_WRITE(GMBUS4 +