Re: [Intel-gfx] [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/display: Do not use i915 frontbuffer tracking implementation

2023-04-27 Thread Hogander, Jouni
On Thu, 2023-03-09 at 14:34 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 12:09:55PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > > > > On 2023-03-09 12:04, Hogander, Jouni wrote: > > > On Mon, 2023-03-06 at 22:58 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 09:23:50PM +0100, Maarten

Re: [Intel-gfx] [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/display: Do not use i915 frontbuffer tracking implementation

2023-03-09 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 12:09:55PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > > On 2023-03-09 12:04, Hogander, Jouni wrote: > > On Mon, 2023-03-06 at 22:58 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 09:23:50PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > >>> Hey, > >>> > >>> On 2023-03-06 16:23, Souza,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/display: Do not use i915 frontbuffer tracking implementation

2023-03-09 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
On 2023-03-09 12:04, Hogander, Jouni wrote: On Mon, 2023-03-06 at 22:58 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 09:23:50PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: Hey, On 2023-03-06 16:23, Souza, Jose wrote: On Mon, 2023-03-06 at 15:16 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: As a fallback if

Re: [Intel-gfx] [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/display: Do not use i915 frontbuffer tracking implementation

2023-03-09 Thread Hogander, Jouni
On Mon, 2023-03-06 at 22:58 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 09:23:50PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > > Hey, > > > > On 2023-03-06 16:23, Souza, Jose wrote: > > > On Mon, 2023-03-06 at 15:16 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > > > > As a fallback if we decide not to merge

Re: [Intel-gfx] [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/display: Do not use i915 frontbuffer tracking implementation

2023-03-08 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 03:29:45PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Hey, > > > On 2023-03-08 14:36, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 01:47:12PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > >> On 2023-03-06 21:58, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > >>> On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 09:23:50PM +0100, Maarten

Re: [Intel-gfx] [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/display: Do not use i915 frontbuffer tracking implementation

2023-03-08 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Hey, On 2023-03-08 14:36, Ville Syrjälä wrote: On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 01:47:12PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: On 2023-03-06 21:58, Ville Syrjälä wrote: On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 09:23:50PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: Hey, On 2023-03-06 16:23, Souza, Jose wrote: On Mon, 2023-03-06 at

Re: [Intel-gfx] [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/display: Do not use i915 frontbuffer tracking implementation

2023-03-08 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 01:47:12PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > > On 2023-03-06 21:58, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 09:23:50PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > >> Hey, > >> > >> On 2023-03-06 16:23, Souza, Jose wrote: > >>> On Mon, 2023-03-06 at 15:16 +0100, Maarten

Re: [Intel-gfx] [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/display: Do not use i915 frontbuffer tracking implementation

2023-03-08 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
On 2023-03-06 21:58, Ville Syrjälä wrote: On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 09:23:50PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: Hey, On 2023-03-06 16:23, Souza, Jose wrote: On Mon, 2023-03-06 at 15:16 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: As a fallback if we decide not to merge the frontbuffer tracking, allow i915

Re: [Intel-gfx] [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/display: Do not use i915 frontbuffer tracking implementation

2023-03-06 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 09:23:50PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Hey, > > On 2023-03-06 16:23, Souza, Jose wrote: > > On Mon, 2023-03-06 at 15:16 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > >> As a fallback if we decide not to merge the frontbuffer tracking, allow > >> i915 to keep its own