On 10/17/2023 4:42 PM, Andi Shyti wrote:
Hi Vinay,
This bit does not cause an explicit L3 flush. We already use
At all? Or only on newer hardware? And as a genuine spec change or as a
bug / workaround?
If the hardware has re-purposed the bit then it is probably worth at
least adding a comme
On 10/17/2023 2:23 AM, Belgaumkar, Vinay wrote:
On 10/16/2023 4:24 PM, John Harrison wrote:
On 10/16/2023 15:55, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
This bit does not cause an explicit L3 flush. We already use
At all? Or only on newer hardware? And as a genuine spec change or as
a bug / workaround?
I
Hi Vinay,
> > > This bit does not cause an explicit L3 flush. We already use
> > At all? Or only on newer hardware? And as a genuine spec change or as a
> > bug / workaround?
> >
> > If the hardware has re-purposed the bit then it is probably worth at
> > least adding a comment to the bit definit
Vinay Belgaumkar writes:
> This bit does not cause an explicit L3 flush. We already use
> PIPE_CONTROL_DC_FLUSH_ENABLE for that purpose.
>
> Cc: Nirmoy Das
> Cc: Mikka Kuoppala
s/kk/k
> Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_engine_cs.c | 8 ++--
> 1 file ch
On 10/16/2023 4:24 PM, John Harrison wrote:
On 10/16/2023 15:55, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
This bit does not cause an explicit L3 flush. We already use
At all? Or only on newer hardware? And as a genuine spec change or as
a bug / workaround?
If the hardware has re-purposed the bit then it is
On 10/16/2023 15:55, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
This bit does not cause an explicit L3 flush. We already use
At all? Or only on newer hardware? And as a genuine spec change or as a
bug / workaround?
If the hardware has re-purposed the bit then it is probably worth at
least adding a comment to th
