Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/slpc: Optmize waitboost for SLPC

2022-10-20 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 19/10/2022 22:12, Belgaumkar, Vinay wrote: On 10/19/2022 12:40 AM, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 18/10/2022 23:15, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote: Waitboost (when SLPC is enabled) results in a H2G message. This can result in thousands of messages during a stress test and fill up an already full

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/slpc: Optmize waitboost for SLPC

2022-10-19 Thread Belgaumkar, Vinay
On 10/19/2022 2:12 PM, Belgaumkar, Vinay wrote: On 10/19/2022 12:40 AM, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 18/10/2022 23:15, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote: Waitboost (when SLPC is enabled) results in a H2G message. This can result in thousands of messages during a stress test and fill up an already full

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/slpc: Optmize waitboost for SLPC

2022-10-19 Thread Belgaumkar, Vinay
On 10/19/2022 12:40 AM, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 18/10/2022 23:15, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote: Waitboost (when SLPC is enabled) results in a H2G message. This can result in thousands of messages during a stress test and fill up an already full CTB. There is no need to request for RP0 if GuC is

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/slpc: Optmize waitboost for SLPC

2022-10-19 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 18/10/2022 23:15, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote: Waitboost (when SLPC is enabled) results in a H2G message. This can result in thousands of messages during a stress test and fill up an already full CTB. There is no need to request for RP0 if GuC is already requesting the same. Signed-off-by: