[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm: Renaming DP training vswing/pre-emph defines

On 8/5/2014 6:00 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Jindal, Sonika > wrote: >> >> >> On 8/5/2014 4:45 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 04:38:17PM +0530, sonika.jindal at intel.com wrote: From: Sonika Jindal Renaming defines to

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm: Renaming DP training vswing/pre-emph defines

On 8/5/2014 4:45 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 04:38:17PM +0530, sonika.jindal at intel.com wrote: >> From: Sonika Jindal >> >> Renaming defines to have levels instead of nominal values. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sonika Jindal > > You can't split up patches like this since this

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm: Renaming DP training vswing/pre-emph defines

On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Jindal, Sonika wrote: > > > On 8/5/2014 4:45 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> >> On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 04:38:17PM +0530, sonika.jindal at intel.com wrote: >>> >>> From: Sonika Jindal >>> >>> Renaming defines to have levels instead of nominal values. >>> >>> Signed-of

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm: Renaming DP training vswing/pre-emph defines

On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 04:38:17PM +0530, sonika.jindal at intel.com wrote: > From: Sonika Jindal > > Renaming defines to have levels instead of nominal values. > > Signed-off-by: Sonika Jindal You can't split up patches like this since this will break compilation. For larger stuff (and imo th