Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/20] drm/i915/guc: Relax CTB response timeout

2021-06-09 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 11:35:39AM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote: > On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 10:33:07AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 10:16:23PM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote: > > > From: Michal Wajdeczko > > > > > > In upcoming patch we will allow more CTB requests to be sent

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/20] drm/i915/guc: Relax CTB response timeout

2021-06-04 Thread Matthew Brost
On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 10:33:07AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 10:16:23PM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote: > > From: Michal Wajdeczko > > > > In upcoming patch we will allow more CTB requests to be sent in > > parallel to the GuC for processing, so we shouldn't assume any mor

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/20] drm/i915/guc: Relax CTB response timeout

2021-06-04 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 10:16:23PM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote: > From: Michal Wajdeczko > > In upcoming patch we will allow more CTB requests to be sent in > parallel to the GuC for processing, so we shouldn't assume any more > that GuC will always reply without 10ms. > > Use bigger value from C