[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/9] drm/i915: split intel_update_plane into check() and commit()

2014-08-29 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Ville Syrj?l? < ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote: > > Would grabbing > > struct drm_plane_state from the atomic branch fix this for you? > > That looks like it's meant to house the user requested coordinates > rather than the clipped ones. What you could do

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/9] drm/i915: split intel_update_plane into check() and commit()

2014-08-29 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 10:55:41AM +0300, Ville Syrj?l? wrote: > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 02:40:08PM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote: > > From: Gustavo Padovan > > > > Due to the upcoming atomic modesetting feature we need to separate > > some update functions into a check step that can fail and a