[Intel-gfx] [PATCH libdrm v3 1/2] intel: Add EXEC_OBJECT_SUPPORTS_48B_ADDRESS flag

2015-08-10 Thread Winiarski, Michal
On Fri, 2015-08-07 at 12:36 +0100, Michel Thierry wrote: > Hi Michał, > > Ben suggested having the set/clear in emit reloc as this is the only > place mesa cares about these wa. > > But I see your point, this will be used not only by mesa, so we > should > have something that is good for all

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH libdrm v3 1/2] intel: Add EXEC_OBJECT_SUPPORTS_48B_ADDRESS flag

2015-08-07 Thread Michał Winiarski
On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 10:45:21AM +0100, Michel Thierry wrote: > Gen8+ supports 48-bit virtual addresses, but some objects must always be > allocated inside the 32-bit address range. > > In specific, any resource used with flat/heapless (0x-0xf000) > General State Heap (GSH) or

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH libdrm v3 1/2] intel: Add EXEC_OBJECT_SUPPORTS_48B_ADDRESS flag

2015-08-07 Thread Michel Thierry
On 8/7/2015 11:56 AM, Michał Winiarski wrote: > On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 10:45:21AM +0100, Michel Thierry wrote: >> Gen8+ supports 48-bit virtual addresses, but some objects must always be >> allocated inside the 32-bit address range. >> >> In specific, any resource used with flat/heapless