Thanks a lot for reviewing, Matthew!
On 5/19/21 11:53 AM, Matthew Auld wrote:
On Tue, 18 May 2021 at 09:28, Thomas Hellström
wrote:
Most logical place to introduce TTM buffer objects is as an i915
gem object backend. We need to add some ops to account for added
functionality like delayed
On Tue, 18 May 2021 at 09:28, Thomas Hellström
wrote:
>
> Most logical place to introduce TTM buffer objects is as an i915
> gem object backend. We need to add some ops to account for added
> functionality like delayed delete and LRU list manipulation.
>
> Initially we support only LMEM and