Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/15] drm/i915/ttm: Introduce a TTM i915 gem object backend

2021-05-19 Thread Thomas Hellström
Thanks a lot for reviewing, Matthew! On 5/19/21 11:53 AM, Matthew Auld wrote: On Tue, 18 May 2021 at 09:28, Thomas Hellström wrote: Most logical place to introduce TTM buffer objects is as an i915 gem object backend. We need to add some ops to account for added functionality like delayed

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/15] drm/i915/ttm: Introduce a TTM i915 gem object backend

2021-05-19 Thread Matthew Auld
On Tue, 18 May 2021 at 09:28, Thomas Hellström wrote: > > Most logical place to introduce TTM buffer objects is as an i915 > gem object backend. We need to add some ops to account for added > functionality like delayed delete and LRU list manipulation. > > Initially we support only LMEM and