On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 07:53, Thierry Reding wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 07, 2019 at 09:58:46PM -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 7:55 AM Thierry Reding
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 04:33:58PM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 at 20:14, Gerd
On Sat, Sep 07, 2019 at 09:58:46PM -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 7:55 AM Thierry Reding
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 04:33:58PM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> > > On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 at 20:14, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > > > Changing
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 7:55 AM Thierry Reding wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 04:33:58PM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 at 20:14, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > > > Changing the order doesn't look hard. Patch attached (untested, have
> > > > > no
> > >
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 04:33:58PM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 at 20:14, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > > Changing the order doesn't look hard. Patch attached (untested, have no
> > > > test hardware). But maybe I missed some detail ...
> > >
> > > I came up
On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 at 20:14, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > > Changing the order doesn't look hard. Patch attached (untested, have no
> > > test hardware). But maybe I missed some detail ...
> >
> > I came up with something very similar by splitting up nouveau_bo_new()
> > into
Hi,
> > Changing the order doesn't look hard. Patch attached (untested, have no
> > test hardware). But maybe I missed some detail ...
>
> I came up with something very similar by splitting up nouveau_bo_new()
> into allocation and initialization steps, so that when necessary the GEM
>
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 07:58:27AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > Hi Gerd,
> >
> > I've been seeing a regression on Nouveau with recent linux-next releases
> > and git bisect points at this commit as the first bad one. If I revert
> > it (there's a tiny conflict with a patch that was merged
> Hi Gerd,
>
> I've been seeing a regression on Nouveau with recent linux-next releases
> and git bisect points at this commit as the first bad one. If I revert
> it (there's a tiny conflict with a patch that was merged subsequently),
> things are back to normal.
>
> I think the reason for this
On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 04:01:10PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Drop vma_node from ttm_buffer_object, use the gem struct
> (base.vma_node) instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann
> Reviewed-by: Christian König
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h | 2 +-
>
