Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-misc-next

2021-10-14 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 10/14/21 3:24 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 10/14/21 2:04 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote: >> Hi Dave, Daniel, >> >> Here's this week drm-misc-next PR >> >> Maxime >> >> drm-misc-next-2021-10-14: >> drm-misc-next for 5.16: > > Ugh, this just missed the drm-privacy-screen work which I

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-misc-next

2021-10-14 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 10/14/21 2:04 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Hi Dave, Daniel, > > Here's this week drm-misc-next PR > > Maxime > > drm-misc-next-2021-10-14: > drm-misc-next for 5.16: Ugh, this just missed the drm-privacy-screen work which I just pushed out to drm-misc-next (I was waiting for the last i915

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-misc-next

2019-10-22 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 4:17 AM Dave Airlie wrote: > > On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 01:49, Sean Paul wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 4:11 AM Tomi Valkeinen > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > On 18/10/2019 23:11, Sean Paul wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 9:46 AM Tomi Valkeinen > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-misc-next

2019-10-21 Thread Dave Airlie
On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 01:49, Sean Paul wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 4:11 AM Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > On 18/10/2019 23:11, Sean Paul wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 9:46 AM Tomi Valkeinen > > > wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi Sean, > > >> > > >> On 17/10/2019 22:26, Sean

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-misc-next

2019-05-23 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 5:55 PM Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 5:53 PM Sean Paul wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 05:47:04PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > > > Hi Daniel and Dave, > > > > > > We keep adding support for panels at a high rate, is it still worth > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-misc-next

2019-05-23 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 5:53 PM Sean Paul wrote: > > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 05:47:04PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > > Hi Daniel and Dave, > > > > We keep adding support for panels at a high rate, is it still worth listing > > them individually under cross subsystem changes? > > > > First