Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 64/97] drm/i915/guc: Reset implementation for new GuC interface

2021-06-04 Thread Matthew Brost
On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 10:16:14AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 5:25 AM Matthew Brost wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 03:33:43PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > > > > > On 06/05/2021 20:14, Matthew Brost wrote: > > > > Reset implementation for new GuC interface.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 64/97] drm/i915/guc: Reset implementation for new GuC interface

2021-06-04 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 5:25 AM Matthew Brost wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 03:33:43PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > > > On 06/05/2021 20:14, Matthew Brost wrote: > > > Reset implementation for new GuC interface. This is the legacy reset > > > implementation which is called when the i915

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 64/97] drm/i915/guc: Reset implementation for new GuC interface

2021-06-03 Thread Matthew Brost
On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 03:33:43PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > On 06/05/2021 20:14, Matthew Brost wrote: > > Reset implementation for new GuC interface. This is the legacy reset > > implementation which is called when the i915 owns the engine hang check. > > Future patches will offload the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 64/97] drm/i915/guc: Reset implementation for new GuC interface

2021-06-02 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 06/05/2021 20:14, Matthew Brost wrote: Reset implementation for new GuC interface. This is the legacy reset implementation which is called when the i915 owns the engine hang check. Future patches will offload the engine hang check to GuC but we will continue to maintain this legacy path as