On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:08:11AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > I have a slightly uneasy feeling about handing out drm_panel pointers
> > (both from here and of_drm_find_panel) without refcounting. If the panel
> > driver gets removed, whoeve
On 01/13/2015 12:08 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> I have a slightly uneasy feeling about handing out drm_panel pointers
>> (both from here and of_drm_find_panel) without refcounting. If the panel
>> driver gets removed, whoever called the find fun
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> I have a slightly uneasy feeling about handing out drm_panel pointers
> (both from here and of_drm_find_panel) without refcounting. If the panel
> driver gets removed, whoever called the find functions will have a
> dangling pointer. I supposed
