On Mon, 2020-03-30 at 19:40 +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Mar 2020 12:37:18 +0200 (CEST)
> Julia Lawall wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 29 Mar 2020, Soumyajit Deb wrote:
> >
> > > I had the same doubt the other day about the replacement of
> > > udelay() with
> > > usleep_range(). The
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 15:03:55 -0700
"John B. Wyatt IV" wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-03-30 at 19:40 +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> > On Sun, 29 Mar 2020 12:37:18 +0200 (CEST)
> > Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 29 Mar 2020, Soumyajit Deb wrote:
> > >
> > > > I had the same doubt the other
On Sun, 29 Mar 2020 12:37:18 +0200 (CEST)
Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Mar 2020, Soumyajit Deb wrote:
>
> > I had the same doubt the other day about the replacement of udelay() with
> > usleep_range(). The corresponding range for the single argument value of
> > udelay() is quite confusing
On Sun, 29 Mar 2020, Soumyajit Deb wrote:
> I had the same doubt the other day about the replacement of udelay() with
> usleep_range(). The corresponding range for the single argument value of
> udelay() is quite confusing as I couldn't decide the range. But as much as I
> noticed checkpatch.pl
On Sun, 29 Mar 2020, John Wyatt wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-03-29 at 11:28 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 29 Mar 2020, John B. Wyatt IV wrote:
> >
> > > Fix style issue with usleep_range being reported as preferred over
> > > udelay.
> > >
> > > Issue reported by checkpatch.
> > >
> > >
On Sun, 29 Mar 2020, John B. Wyatt IV wrote:
> Fix style issue with usleep_range being reported as preferred over
> udelay.
>
> Issue reported by checkpatch.
>
> Please review.
>
> As written in Documentation/timers/timers-howto.rst udelay is the
> generally preferred API. hrtimers, as noted
On Sun, 2020-03-29 at 11:28 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
> On Sun, 29 Mar 2020, John B. Wyatt IV wrote:
>
> > Fix style issue with usleep_range being reported as preferred over
> > udelay.
> >
> > Issue reported by checkpatch.
> >
> > Please review.
> >
> > As written in
I had the same doubt the other day about the replacement of udelay() with
usleep_range(). The corresponding range for the single argument value of
udelay() is quite confusing as I couldn't decide the range.
But as much as I noticed checkpatch.pl gives warning for replacing udelay()
with
On Sun, 2020-03-29 at 12:37 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
> On Sun, 29 Mar 2020, Soumyajit Deb wrote:
>
> > I had the same doubt the other day about the replacement of udelay() with
> > usleep_range(). The corresponding range for the single argument value of
> > udelay() is quite confusing as I
On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 2:23 PM Sam Muhammed wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-03-29 at 12:37 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > On Sun, 29 Mar 2020, Soumyajit Deb wrote:
> >
First of all, let's stop topposting.
> > > I had the same doubt the other day about the replacement of udelay() with
> > >
10 matches
Mail list logo
