Re: [PATCH] DRM: UDL: get rid of useless vblank initialization

2018-10-23 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:01:14AM +, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote: > Hi David, > > Maybe you have any comments or remarks about this patch? > And if you don't could you please apply it. Thanks! Hm I hoped Sean would pick this up. I stuffed it into drm-misc-next now, and Sean owes me one. Generally

Re: [PATCH] DRM: UDL: get rid of useless vblank initialization

2018-10-23 Thread Eugeniy Paltsev
Hi David, Maybe you have any comments or remarks about this patch? And if you don't could you please apply it. Thanks! On Fri, 2018-09-28 at 17:41 +0300, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote: > UDL doesn't support vblank functionality so we don't need to > initialize vblank here (we are able to send page flip

Re: [PATCH] DRM: UDL: get rid of useless vblank initialization

2018-10-01 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 05:41:26PM +0300, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote: > UDL doesn't support vblank functionality so we don't need to > initialize vblank here (we are able to send page flip > completion events even without vblank initialization) > > Moreover current drm_vblank_init call with num_crtcs

[PATCH] DRM: UDL: get rid of useless vblank initialization

2018-09-28 Thread Eugeniy Paltsev
UDL doesn't support vblank functionality so we don't need to initialize vblank here (we are able to send page flip completion events even without vblank initialization) Moreover current drm_vblank_init call with num_crtcs > 0 causes sending DRM_EVENT_FLIP_COMPLETE event with zero timestamp every