why? is there a design doc mentioned for this on reservation ?
From: Christian K?nig <ckoenig.leichtzumer...@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 6, 2018 4:03:39 PM
To: Liu, Monk; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-buf/reservation: shoul
NAK, the newly added fence must always be newer than the existing one.
Christian.
Am 06.03.2018 um 04:09 schrieb Monk Liu:
Change-Id: If6a979ba9fd6c923b82212f35f07a9ff31c86767
Signed-off-by: Monk Liu
---
drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1
Yeah, right
-Original Message-
From: Zhou, David(ChunMing)
Sent: 2018年3月6日 11:38
To: Liu, Monk <monk@amd.com>; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-buf/reservation: should keep the new fence in
add_shared_inplace
On 2018年03月06日 11:09, Monk Liu wrote:
&g
On 2018年03月06日 11:09, Monk Liu wrote:
Change-Id: If6a979ba9fd6c923b82212f35f07a9ff31c86767
Signed-off-by: Monk Liu
---
drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c
Change-Id: If6a979ba9fd6c923b82212f35f07a9ff31c86767
Signed-off-by: Monk Liu
---
drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c b/drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c
index 314eb10..29b7e45 100644
---