Hi TJ,
On Thu, 18 Jan 2024 at 15:32, Christian König
wrote:
> Am 17.01.24 um 19:11 schrieb T.J. Mercier:
>
> DMA buffers allocated from the CMA dma-buf heap get counted under
> RssFile for processes that map them and trigger page faults. In
> addition to the incorrect accounting reported to user
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 08:57:16AM -0800, T.J. Mercier wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 6:49 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 11:02:22AM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> > > Am 17.01.24 um 19:11 schrieb T.J. Mercier:
> > > > DMA buffers allocated from the CMA dma-buf heap get
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 6:49 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 11:02:22AM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> > Am 17.01.24 um 19:11 schrieb T.J. Mercier:
> > > DMA buffers allocated from the CMA dma-buf heap get counted under
> > > RssFile for processes that map them and trigger pag
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 11:02:22AM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> Am 17.01.24 um 19:11 schrieb T.J. Mercier:
> > DMA buffers allocated from the CMA dma-buf heap get counted under
> > RssFile for processes that map them and trigger page faults. In
> > addition to the incorrect accounting reported t
Am 17.01.24 um 19:11 schrieb T.J. Mercier:
DMA buffers allocated from the CMA dma-buf heap get counted under
RssFile for processes that map them and trigger page faults. In
addition to the incorrect accounting reported to userspace, reclaim
behavior was influenced by the MM_FILEPAGES counter unti
DMA buffers allocated from the CMA dma-buf heap get counted under
RssFile for processes that map them and trigger page faults. In
addition to the incorrect accounting reported to userspace, reclaim
behavior was influenced by the MM_FILEPAGES counter until linux 6.8, but
this memory is not reclaimab
