Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/display: fix cursor-plane-only atomic commits not triggering pageflips

2023-12-08 Thread Xaver Hugl
Sorry, it looks like I sent this too soon. I tested the patch on a second PC and it doesn't fix the issue there. Am Do., 7. Dez. 2023 um 19:25 Uhr schrieb Xaver Hugl : > > With VRR, every atomic commit affecting a given display must trigger > a new scanout cycle, so that userspace is able to

[PATCH] drm/amd/display: fix cursor-plane-only atomic commits not triggering pageflips

2023-12-08 Thread Xaver Hugl
With VRR, every atomic commit affecting a given display must trigger a new scanout cycle, so that userspace is able to control the refresh rate of the display. Before this commit, this was not the case for atomic commits that only contain cursor plane properties. Closes:

Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/display: fix cursor-plane-only atomic commits not triggering pageflips

2023-12-07 Thread Harry Wentland
On 2023-12-07 14:30, Xaver Hugl wrote: Sorry, it looks like I sent this too soon. I tested the patch on a second PC and it doesn't fix the issue there. Ah, too bad. Won't merge it then. Harry Am Do., 7. Dez. 2023 um 19:25 Uhr schrieb Xaver Hugl : With VRR, every atomic commit

Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/display: fix cursor-plane-only atomic commits not triggering pageflips

2023-12-07 Thread Harry Wentland
On 2023-12-07 13:25, Xaver Hugl wrote: With VRR, every atomic commit affecting a given display must trigger a new scanout cycle, so that userspace is able to control the refresh rate of the display. Before this commit, this was not the case for atomic commits that only contain cursor plane