On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Archit Taneja
wrote:
>
>
> On 12/02/2016 09:33 PM, Sean Paul wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 10:54 PM, Archit Taneja
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 12/02/2016 08:02 AM, zain wang wrote:
We will ignored PSR setting if panel not support it.
On 12/02/2016 09:33 PM, Sean Paul wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 10:54 PM, Archit Taneja
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 12/02/2016 08:02 AM, zain wang wrote:
>>>
>>> We will ignored PSR setting if panel not support it. So, in this case, we
>>> should
>>> return from analogix_dp_enable/disable_psr()
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 10:54 PM, Archit Taneja
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 12/02/2016 08:02 AM, zain wang wrote:
>>
>> We will ignored PSR setting if panel not support it. So, in this case, we
>> should
>> return from analogix_dp_enable/disable_psr() without any error code.
>> Let's retrun 0 instead of
We will ignored PSR setting if panel not support it. So, in this case, we should
return from analogix_dp_enable/disable_psr() without any error code.
Let's retrun 0 instead of -EINVAL when panel not support PSR in
analogix_dp_enable/disable_psr().
Signed-off-by: zain wang
---
Hi,
On 12/02/2016 08:02 AM, zain wang wrote:
> We will ignored PSR setting if panel not support it. So, in this case, we
> should
> return from analogix_dp_enable/disable_psr() without any error code.
> Let's retrun 0 instead of -EINVAL when panel not support PSR in
>
