Hi,
On 5/13/24 13:56, Liu Ying wrote:
On 5/11/24 23:08, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
The check on the existence of bridge->encoder on the implementation layer
of drm bridge driver is not necessary, as it has already been done in the
drm_bridge_attach() function. It is guaranteed that the .encoder
On 5/11/24 23:08, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
> The check on the existence of bridge->encoder on the implementation layer
> of drm bridge driver is not necessary, as it has already been done in the
> drm_bridge_attach() function. It is guaranteed that the .encoder member
> of the drm_bridge instance is
Hi Sui,
Thank you for the patch.
On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 11:08:16PM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
> The check on the existence of bridge->encoder on the implementation layer
> of drm bridge driver is not necessary, as it has already been done in the
> drm_bridge_attach() function. It is guaranteed
The check on the existence of bridge->encoder on the implementation layer
of drm bridge driver is not necessary, as it has already been done in the
drm_bridge_attach() function. It is guaranteed that the .encoder member
of the drm_bridge instance is not NULL when various imx_xxx_bridge_attach()
