On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 02:52:23PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 4:41 PM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 4:29 PM Linus Walleij
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 1:40 AM Dmitry Torokhov
> > > wrote:
>
> > > I'm happy to merge it into the GPIO tree if
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 4:41 PM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 4:29 PM Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 1:40 AM Dmitry Torokhov
> > wrote:
> > I'm happy to merge it into the GPIO tree if some DRM maintainer can
> > provide an ACK.
>
> Ack.
Thanks!
> > Getting ACK
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 8:43 PM Dmitry Torokhov
wrote:
> Instead of fwnode_get_named_gpiod() that I plan to hide away, let's use
> the new fwnode_gpiod_get_index() that mimics gpiod_get_index(), but
> works with arbitrary firmware node.
>
> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry T
On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 09:53:23PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 04:41:41PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 4:29 PM Linus Walleij wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 1:40 AM Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 11:4
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 04:41:41PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 4:29 PM Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 1:40 AM Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 11:43:20AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> >
> > > > Instead of fwnode_get_named_g
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 4:29 PM Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 1:40 AM Dmitry Torokhov
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 11:43:20AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>
> > > Instead of fwnode_get_named_gpiod() that I plan to hide away, let's use
> > > the new fwnode_gpiod_get_index
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 1:40 AM Dmitry Torokhov
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 11:43:20AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Instead of fwnode_get_named_gpiod() that I plan to hide away, let's use
> > the new fwnode_gpiod_get_index() that mimics gpiod_get_index(), but
> > works with arbitrary fir
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 11:43:20AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Instead of fwnode_get_named_gpiod() that I plan to hide away, let's use
> the new fwnode_gpiod_get_index() that mimics gpiod_get_index(), but
> works with arbitrary firmware node.
>
> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart
> Signed-off-by:
Hi Dmitry,
I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on linus/master]
[cannot apply to v5.4-rc3 next-20191014]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify
Hi Dmitry,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[cannot apply to v5.4-rc3 next-20191014]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
ba
Instead of fwnode_get_named_gpiod() that I plan to hide away, let's use
the new fwnode_gpiod_get_index() that mimics gpiod_get_index(), but
works with arbitrary firmware node.
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
---
Andrzej, Neil,
This depends on the new code that can
11 matches
Mail list logo