Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-tfp410: switch to using fwnode_gpiod_get_index()

2019-11-13 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 02:52:23PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 4:41 PM Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 4:29 PM Linus Walleij > > wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 1:40 AM Dmitry Torokhov > > > wrote: > > > > I'm happy to merge it into the GPIO tree if

Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-tfp410: switch to using fwnode_gpiod_get_index()

2019-11-13 Thread Linus Walleij
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 4:41 PM Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 4:29 PM Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 1:40 AM Dmitry Torokhov > > wrote: > > I'm happy to merge it into the GPIO tree if some DRM maintainer can > > provide an ACK. > > Ack. Thanks! > > Getting ACK

Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-tfp410: switch to using fwnode_gpiod_get_index()

2019-11-13 Thread Linus Walleij
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 8:43 PM Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Instead of fwnode_get_named_gpiod() that I plan to hide away, let's use > the new fwnode_gpiod_get_index() that mimics gpiod_get_index(), but > works with arbitrary firmware node. > > Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart > Signed-off-by: Dmitry T

Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-tfp410: switch to using fwnode_gpiod_get_index()

2019-11-06 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 09:53:23PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 04:41:41PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 4:29 PM Linus Walleij wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 1:40 AM Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 11:4

Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-tfp410: switch to using fwnode_gpiod_get_index()

2019-11-05 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Daniel, On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 04:41:41PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 4:29 PM Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 1:40 AM Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 11:43:20AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > > > > Instead of fwnode_get_named_g

Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-tfp410: switch to using fwnode_gpiod_get_index()

2019-11-05 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 4:29 PM Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 1:40 AM Dmitry Torokhov > wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 11:43:20AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > > Instead of fwnode_get_named_gpiod() that I plan to hide away, let's use > > > the new fwnode_gpiod_get_index

Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-tfp410: switch to using fwnode_gpiod_get_index()

2019-11-05 Thread Linus Walleij
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 1:40 AM Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 11:43:20AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > Instead of fwnode_get_named_gpiod() that I plan to hide away, let's use > > the new fwnode_gpiod_get_index() that mimics gpiod_get_index(), but > > works with arbitrary fir

Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-tfp410: switch to using fwnode_gpiod_get_index()

2019-11-05 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 11:43:20AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Instead of fwnode_get_named_gpiod() that I plan to hide away, let's use > the new fwnode_gpiod_get_index() that mimics gpiod_get_index(), but > works with arbitrary firmware node. > > Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart > Signed-off-by:

Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-tfp410: switch to using fwnode_gpiod_get_index()

2019-10-14 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Dmitry, I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve: [auto build test WARNING on linus/master] [cannot apply to v5.4-rc3 next-20191014] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify

Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-tfp410: switch to using fwnode_gpiod_get_index()

2019-10-14 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Dmitry, I love your patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on linus/master] [cannot apply to v5.4-rc3 next-20191014] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the ba

[PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-tfp410: switch to using fwnode_gpiod_get_index()

2019-10-14 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
Instead of fwnode_get_named_gpiod() that I plan to hide away, let's use the new fwnode_gpiod_get_index() that mimics gpiod_get_index(), but works with arbitrary firmware node. Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov --- Andrzej, Neil, This depends on the new code that can