Hi Christian,
Sorry, i've sent a v2 before, please check that.
On 8/9 星期二 2:05, Christian König wrote:
Am 02.08.22 um 13:33 schrieb Jeffy Chen:
Currently we are assuming a one to one mapping between dmabuf and handle
when releasing GEM handles.
But that is not always true, since we would
Am 02.08.22 um 13:33 schrieb Jeffy Chen:
Currently we are assuming a one to one mapping between dmabuf and handle
when releasing GEM handles.
But that is not always true, since we would create extra handles for the
GEM obj in cases like gem_open() and getfb{,2}().
A similar issue was
Currently we are assuming a one to one mapping between dmabuf and handle
when releasing GEM handles.
But that is not always true, since we would create extra handles for the
GEM obj in cases like gem_open() and getfb{,2}().
A similar issue was reported at:
