On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 08:06:01PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 12:57:06PM -0500, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 07:52:21PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 02:12:51PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > > Commit 1fd4a5a36f9f
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 12:57:06PM -0500, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 07:52:21PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 02:12:51PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > Commit 1fd4a5a36f9f ("drm/connector: Rename legacy TV property") failed
> > > to update all the
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 07:52:21PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 02:12:51PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Commit 1fd4a5a36f9f ("drm/connector: Rename legacy TV property") failed
> > to update all the users of the struct drm_tv_connector_state mode field,
> > which
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 02:12:51PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Commit 1fd4a5a36f9f ("drm/connector: Rename legacy TV property") failed
> to update all the users of the struct drm_tv_connector_state mode field,
> which resulted in a build failure in i915.
>
> However, a subsequent commit in the
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 02:12:51PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Commit 1fd4a5a36f9f ("drm/connector: Rename legacy TV property") failed
> to update all the users of the struct drm_tv_connector_state mode field,
> which resulted in a build failure in i915.
>
> However, a subsequent commit in the
Commit 1fd4a5a36f9f ("drm/connector: Rename legacy TV property") failed
to update all the users of the struct drm_tv_connector_state mode field,
which resulted in a build failure in i915.
However, a subsequent commit in the same series reintroduced a mode
field in that structure, with a different
