On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 11:35:41AM +0800, Zenghui Yu wrote:
> As per the comment on top of acpi_evaluate_dsm():
>
> | * Evaluate device's _DSM method with specified GUID, revision id and
> | * function number. Caller needs to free the returned object.
>
> We should free the returned object of
[+linux-acpi]
ping
On 2021/9/6 11:35, Zenghui Yu wrote:
As per the comment on top of acpi_evaluate_dsm():
| * Evaluate device's _DSM method with specified GUID, revision id and
| * function number. Caller needs to free the returned object.
We should free the returned object of
As per the comment on top of acpi_evaluate_dsm():
| * Evaluate device's _DSM method with specified GUID, revision id and
| * function number. Caller needs to free the returned object.
We should free the returned object of acpi_evaluate_dsm() to avoid memory
leakage. Otherwise the kmemleak splat