The idr code already passes us the pointer associated with that id, so
no need to look it up again. Also, we'll kill the idr right away, so
there's no issue with leaving these dangling pointers behind - the
current code does the same.
Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter
---
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 18:56:15 +0200
Daniel Vetter wrote:
> The idr code already passes us the pointer associated with that id, so
> no need to look it up again. Also, we'll kill the idr right away, so
> there's no issue with leaving these dangling pointers behind - the
> current code does the
The idr code already passes us the pointer associated with that id, so
no need to look it up again. Also, we'll kill the idr right away, so
there's no issue with leaving these dangling pointers behind - the
current code does the same.
Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch
---
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 18:56:15 +0200
Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch wrote:
The idr code already passes us the pointer associated with that id, so
no need to look it up again. Also, we'll kill the idr right away, so
there's no issue with leaving these dangling pointers behind - the
current
