On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 11:12:11AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> It's lockless, and userspace might chance it underneath us. That's not
> really a problem, all userspace gets is a slightly dysfunctional
> lease with the current code. But this might change, and gcc might
> decide to reload a few
It's lockless, and userspace might chance it underneath us. That's not
really a problem, all userspace gets is a slightly dysfunctional
lease with the current code. But this might change, and gcc might
decide to reload a few too many times, and then boom. So better safe
than sorry.
v2: Remove the
It's lockless, and userspace might chance it underneath us. That's not
really a problem, all userspace gets is a slightly dysfunctional
lease with the current code. But this might change, and gcc might
decide to reload a few too many times, and then boom. So better safe
than sorry.
v2: Remove the
