On 31/07/15 19:11, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 31/07/15 17:43, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> On 31/07/15 17:36, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>> Do you have a reproducible way of achieving the multiple buffer on
>>> validation list thing?
Ilia, Peter.
I've filed a bug for you here :
https://bugs.freedesktop
On 31/07/15 17:43, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 31/07/15 17:36, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> Do you have a reproducible way of achieving the multiple buffer on
>> validation list thing?
Reliable enough. Start Chrome, then get Chrome to open a menu on top of
it's own screen - for example click the top ri
On 31/07/15 17:36, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 6:27 AM, Bryan O'Donoghue
> wrote:
>> ah no... 2.4.60 is right...
>>
>> Yes so Ilia - I've switched out 2.4.60 as per your suggestion to 2.4.56
>> (getting the version numbers right :) ) and it's still definitely giving me
>> the mult
On 30/07/15 22:45, Peter Hurley wrote:
> [ +cc Debian maintainer ]
>
> On 07/30/2015 11:26 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 30 July 2015 at 16:02, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Bryan O'Donoghue
>>> wrote:
On 30/07/15 15:52, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>
> On 30/07
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 6:27 AM, Bryan O'Donoghue
wrote:
> ah no... 2.4.60 is right...
>
> Yes so Ilia - I've switched out 2.4.60 as per your suggestion to 2.4.56
> (getting the version numbers right :) ) and it's still definitely giving me
> the multiple instances message.
This is going to sound
On 31/07/15 10:58, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 31/07/15 10:53, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> On 31/07/15 01:03, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>>> On 30/07/15 22:45, Peter Hurley wrote:
[ +cc Debian maintainer ]
On 07/30/2015 11:26 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 30 July 2015 at 16:02, Ilia
On 31/07/15 10:53, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 31/07/15 01:03, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> On 30/07/15 22:45, Peter Hurley wrote:
>>> [ +cc Debian maintainer ]
>>>
>>> On 07/30/2015 11:26 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 30 July 2015 at 16:02, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:56
On 31/07/15 01:03, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 30/07/15 22:45, Peter Hurley wrote:
>> [ +cc Debian maintainer ]
>>
>> On 07/30/2015 11:26 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>> On 30 July 2015 at 16:02, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Bryan O'Donoghue
wrote:
> On 30/07/15
On 30/07/15 22:45, Peter Hurley wrote:
> [ +cc Debian maintainer ]
>
> On 07/30/2015 11:26 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 30 July 2015 at 16:02, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Bryan O'Donoghue
>>> wrote:
On 30/07/15 15:52, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>
> On 30/07
[ +cc Debian maintainer ]
On 07/30/2015 11:26 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 30 July 2015 at 16:02, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Bryan O'Donoghue
>> wrote:
>>> On 30/07/15 15:52, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
On 30/07/15 15:49, Peter Hurley wrote:
>
> On 07/3
On 30 July 2015 at 16:02, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Bryan O'Donoghue
> wrote:
>> On 30/07/15 15:52, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>>>
>>> On 30/07/15 15:49, Peter Hurley wrote:
On 07/30/2015 10:12 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>
> Is this happening with libdrm 2.
On 30/07/15 16:02, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>
> That's unfortunate. I know next to nothing about debian/ubuntu or how
> they do versions or how to even build packages for them. But they're
> big distros, presumably they have support teams of some sort, perhaps
> they can help you.
>
> Assuming that switc
On 30/07/15 15:52, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 30/07/15 15:49, Peter Hurley wrote:
>> On 07/30/2015 10:12 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>> Is this happening with libdrm 2.4.60? If so, that's a known
>>> (user-side) issue and should be fixed by using any version but that
>>> one.
>>
>> What's the freedes
On 30/07/15 15:49, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 07/30/2015 10:12 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> Is this happening with libdrm 2.4.60? If so, that's a known
>> (user-side) issue and should be fixed by using any version but that
>> one.
>
> What's the freedesktop bugzilla # for reference?
>
> Regards,
> Peter
On 30/07/15 15:12, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> Is this happening with libdrm 2.4.60? If so, that's a known
> (user-side) issue and should be fixed by using any version but that
> one.
>
Yes that's my version 2.4.60.
Ubuntu is shipping Chrome Version 44.0.2403.125 (64-bit). With this version
of the browser and current tip-of-tree 86ea07ca846a I get the following
error message followed by a lock-up of X.
nouveau E[chrome[2737]] multiple instances of buffer 33 on validation list
nouveau E[chrome[2737]] validate_
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Bryan O'Donoghue
wrote:
> On 30/07/15 15:52, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>>
>> On 30/07/15 15:49, Peter Hurley wrote:
>>>
>>> On 07/30/2015 10:12 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
Is this happening with libdrm 2.4.60? If so, that's a known
(user-side) issue and sh
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Peter Hurley
wrote:
> On 07/30/2015 10:12 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> Is this happening with libdrm 2.4.60? If so, that's a known
>> (user-side) issue and should be fixed by using any version but that
>> one.
>
> What's the freedesktop bugzilla # for reference?
I
On 07/30/2015 10:12 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> Is this happening with libdrm 2.4.60? If so, that's a known
> (user-side) issue and should be fixed by using any version but that
> one.
What's the freedesktop bugzilla # for reference?
Regards,
Peter Hurley
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 6:28 AM, Bryan O'
On 07/30/2015 10:12 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> Is this happening with libdrm 2.4.60? If so, that's a known
> (user-side) issue and should be fixed by using any version but that
> one.
What's the freedesktop bugzilla # for reference?
Regards,
Peter Hurley
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 6:28 AM, Bryan O'
Is this happening with libdrm 2.4.60? If so, that's a known
(user-side) issue and should be fixed by using any version but that
one.
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 6:28 AM, Bryan O'Donoghue
wrote:
> Ubuntu is shipping Chrome Version 44.0.2403.125 (64-bit). With this version
> of the browser and current
21 matches
Mail list logo
