Hey,
Op 05-02-13 21:52, Ben Skeggs schreef:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 10:59:28PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> Op 04-02-13 22:30, Marcin Slusarz schreef:
>>> 1) Lockdep thinks all nouveau subdevs belong to the same class and can be
>>> locked in arbitrary order, which is not true (at least in
Hey,
Op 05-02-13 21:52, Ben Skeggs schreef:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 10:59:28PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> Op 04-02-13 22:30, Marcin Slusarz schreef:
>>> 1) Lockdep thinks all nouveau subdevs belong to the same class and can be
>>> locked in arbitrary order, which is not true (at least in
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 10:59:28PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 04-02-13 22:30, Marcin Slusarz schreef:
> > 1) Lockdep thinks all nouveau subdevs belong to the same class and can be
> > locked in arbitrary order, which is not true (at least in general case).
> > Tell it to distinguish subde
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 10:59:28PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 04-02-13 22:30, Marcin Slusarz schreef:
> > 1) Lockdep thinks all nouveau subdevs belong to the same class and can be
> > locked in arbitrary order, which is not true (at least in general case).
> > Tell it to distinguish subde
Hi Maarten
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 22:59 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 04-02-13 22:30, Marcin Slusarz schreef:
> > 1) Lockdep thinks all nouveau subdevs belong to the same class and can be
> > locked in arbitrary order, which is not true (at least in general case).
> > Tell it to distinguish
Op 04-02-13 22:30, Marcin Slusarz schreef:
> 1) Lockdep thinks all nouveau subdevs belong to the same class and can be
> locked in arbitrary order, which is not true (at least in general case).
> Tell it to distinguish subdevs by (o)class type.
Apart from this specific case, is there any other reas
1) Lockdep thinks all nouveau subdevs belong to the same class and can be
locked in arbitrary order, which is not true (at least in general case).
Tell it to distinguish subdevs by (o)class type.
2) DRM client can be locked under user client lock - tell lockdep to put DRM
client lock in a separate
Hi Maarten
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 22:59 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 04-02-13 22:30, Marcin Slusarz schreef:
> > 1) Lockdep thinks all nouveau subdevs belong to the same class and can be
> > locked in arbitrary order, which is not true (at least in general case).
> > Tell it to distinguish
Op 04-02-13 22:30, Marcin Slusarz schreef:
> 1) Lockdep thinks all nouveau subdevs belong to the same class and can be
> locked in arbitrary order, which is not true (at least in general case).
> Tell it to distinguish subdevs by (o)class type.
Apart from this specific case, is there any other reas
1) Lockdep thinks all nouveau subdevs belong to the same class and can be
locked in arbitrary order, which is not true (at least in general case).
Tell it to distinguish subdevs by (o)class type.
2) DRM client can be locked under user client lock - tell lockdep to put DRM
client lock in a separate
10 matches
Mail list logo
