On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> I admit I'm not really an ACPI expert, but thinking about this more,
> I'm wondering if maybe we should just send the appropriate brightness
> change, switch display, etc. event to userspace rather than handling
> it directly in the radeon
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Luca Tettamanti
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Alex Deucher
>> wrote:
>>> I admit I'm not really an ACPI expert, but thinking about this more,
>>> I'm wondering if maybe we should just send
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> I admit I'm not really an ACPI expert, but thinking about this more,
>> I'm wondering if maybe we should just send the appropriate brightness
>> change, switch display, etc. event to
I admit I'm not really an ACPI expert, but thinking about this more,
I'm wondering if maybe we should just send the appropriate brightness
change, switch display, etc. event to userspace rather than handling
it directly in the radeon driver, then let userspace callback down via
the bl interface,
I admit I'm not really an ACPI expert, but thinking about this more,
I'm wondering if maybe we should just send the appropriate brightness
change, switch display, etc. event to userspace rather than handling
it directly in the radeon driver, then let userspace callback down via
the bl interface,
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote:
I admit I'm not really an ACPI expert, but thinking about this more,
I'm wondering if maybe we should just send the appropriate brightness
change, switch display, etc. event to userspace rather than handling
it directly
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote:
I admit I'm not really an ACPI expert, but thinking about this more,
I'm wondering if maybe we should just send the appropriate brightness
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote:
I admit I'm not really an ACPI expert, but thinking about this more,
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 05:33:16PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> Patches look good. I picked them up and combined them with may
> patches plus a few other small fixes. They are available here:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux/log/?h=acpi_patches
> Let me know what you think.
Looks ok,
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:57 AM, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 05:33:16PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> Patches look good. I picked them up and combined them with may
>> patches plus a few other small fixes. They are available here:
>>
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 05:33:16PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
Patches look good. I picked them up and combined them with may
patches plus a few other small fixes. They are available here:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux/log/?h=acpi_patches
Let me know what you think.
Looks ok, I
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:57 AM, Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 05:33:16PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
Patches look good. I picked them up and combined them with may
patches plus a few other small fixes. They are available here:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 09:58:04AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 5:16 AM, Luca Tettamanti
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Alex Deucher
> > wrote:
> >> Regarding patches 3 and 4, it might be easier to just store a pointer
> >> to the relevant encoder when
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 09:58:04AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 5:16 AM, Luca Tettamanti
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Alex Deucher
>> > wrote:
>> >> Regarding patches 3 and 4, it might be
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> Regarding patches 3 and 4, it might be easier to just store a pointer
> to the relevant encoder when you verify ATIF rather than walking the
> encoder list every time.
Makes sense, I was unsure about the lifetime of the encoders, but
AFAICS
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 5:16 AM, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Alex Deucher
> wrote:
>> Regarding patches 3 and 4, it might be easier to just store a pointer
>> to the relevant encoder when you verify ATIF rather than walking the
>> encoder list every time.
>
>
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote:
Regarding patches 3 and 4, it might be easier to just store a pointer
to the relevant encoder when you verify ATIF rather than walking the
encoder list every time.
Makes sense, I was unsure about the lifetime of the
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 5:16 AM, Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote:
Regarding patches 3 and 4, it might be easier to just store a pointer
to the relevant encoder when you verify ATIF rather than walking the
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 09:58:04AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 5:16 AM, Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com
wrote:
Regarding patches 3 and 4, it might be easier to just store a pointer
to
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 09:58:04AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 5:16 AM, Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:30 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Luca Tettamanti
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:20:15AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>> Supported DWORD Bit vector providing supported functions
>>> information. Each bit marks
>>> Functions Bit
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:20:15AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Luca Tettamanti
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 05:29:25PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Luca Tettamanti
> >> wrote:
> >> > I just found the first problem
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:20:15AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Luca Tettamanti
>> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 05:29:25PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Luca
? ??2012-07-29 ? 15:10 +0200?Luca Tettamanti ???
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 11:51:48AM +0800, joeyli wrote:
> > Hi Luca,
> >
> > ? ??2012-07-28 ? 16:56 +0200?Luca Tettamanti ???
> > > I just found the first problem (probably a BIOS bug):
> > > ATIF_FUNCTION_GET_SYSTEM_PARAMETERS is implemented in
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:20:15AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Luca Tettamanti
>> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 05:29:25PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Luca
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 04:32:47PM +0800, joeyli wrote:
> ? ??2012-07-29 ? 15:10 +0200?Luca Tettamanti ???
> > On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 11:51:48AM +0800, joeyli wrote:
> > > Hi Luca,
> > >
> > > ? ??2012-07-28 ? 16:56 +0200?Luca Tettamanti ???
> > > > I just found the first problem (probably a
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm attaching a first draft of my work. The first 3 patches are
> infrastructure work, the fourth wires the notification handler and
> retrieves the requests from the system BIOS, but it does not actually
> change brightness yet.
>
>
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 05:29:25PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Luca Tettamanti
>> wrote:
>> > I just found the first problem (probably a BIOS bug):
>> > ATIF_FUNCTION_GET_SYSTEM_PARAMETERS is
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 04:32:47PM +0800, joeyli wrote:
於 日,2012-07-29 於 15:10 +0200,Luca Tettamanti 提到:
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 11:51:48AM +0800, joeyli wrote:
Hi Luca,
於 六,2012-07-28 於 16:56 +0200,Luca Tettamanti 提到:
I just found the first problem (probably a BIOS bug):
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 05:29:25PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com
wrote:
I just found the first problem (probably a BIOS bug):
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm attaching a first draft of my work. The first 3 patches are
infrastructure work, the fourth wires the notification handler and
retrieves the requests from the system BIOS, but it does not actually
change
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:20:15AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 05:29:25PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com
wrote:
I just
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:20:15AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 05:29:25PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Sat, Jul 28,
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:30 PM, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:20:15AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
Supported DWORD Bit vector providing supported functions
information. Each
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:20:15AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 05:29:25PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Sat, Jul 28,
於 日,2012-07-29 於 15:10 +0200,Luca Tettamanti 提到:
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 11:51:48AM +0800, joeyli wrote:
Hi Luca,
於 六,2012-07-28 於 16:56 +0200,Luca Tettamanti 提到:
I just found the first problem (probably a BIOS bug):
ATIF_FUNCTION_GET_SYSTEM_PARAMETERS is implemented in the DSDT,
Hi,
I'm attaching a first draft of my work. The first 3 patches are
infrastructure work, the fourth wires the notification handler and
retrieves the requests from the system BIOS, but it does not actually
change brightness yet.
The problem here is how to get the correct encoder: should I just
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 11:51:48AM +0800, joeyli wrote:
> Hi Luca,
>
> ? ??2012-07-28 ? 16:56 +0200?Luca Tettamanti ???
> > I just found the first problem (probably a BIOS bug):
> > ATIF_FUNCTION_GET_SYSTEM_PARAMETERS is implemented in the DSDT, but the
> > corresponding bit
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 05:29:25PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Luca Tettamanti
> wrote:
> > I just found the first problem (probably a BIOS bug):
> > ATIF_FUNCTION_GET_SYSTEM_PARAMETERS is implemented in the DSDT, but the
> > corresponding bit
Hi Luca,
? ??2012-07-28 ? 16:56 +0200?Luca Tettamanti ???
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 03:42:26PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Luca Tettamanti
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:35:25AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > >> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:58 AM,
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 05:29:25PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com wrote:
I just found the first problem (probably a BIOS bug):
ATIF_FUNCTION_GET_SYSTEM_PARAMETERS is implemented in the DSDT, but the
corresponding bit
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 11:51:48AM +0800, joeyli wrote:
Hi Luca,
於 六,2012-07-28 於 16:56 +0200,Luca Tettamanti 提到:
I just found the first problem (probably a BIOS bug):
ATIF_FUNCTION_GET_SYSTEM_PARAMETERS is implemented in the DSDT, but the
corresponding bit
Hi,
I'm attaching a first draft of my work. The first 3 patches are
infrastructure work, the fourth wires the notification handler and
retrieves the requests from the system BIOS, but it does not actually
change brightness yet.
The problem here is how to get the correct encoder: should I just
於 四,2012-07-26 於 14:58 +0200,Luca Tettamanti 提到:
- again ACPI video module gets the nodification (in this case
ACPI_VIDEO_NOTIFY_PROBE), re-enumerated and send KEY_SWITCHVIDEOMODE
- KDE seems this and muck with the screen configuration :(
- meanwhile the brightness notification is
於 四,2012-07-26 於 23:31 -0400,Alex Deucher 提到:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:50 PM, joeyli j...@suse.com wrote:
於 四,2012-07-26 於 14:58 +0200,Luca Tettamanti 提到:
- again ACPI video module gets the nodification (in this case
ACPI_VIDEO_NOTIFY_PROBE), re-enumerated and send KEY_SWITCHVIDEOMODE
於 五,2012-07-27 於 23:32 +0800,joeyli 提到:
於 五,2012-07-27 於 09:21 -0400,Alex Deucher 提到:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:46 AM, joeyli j...@suse.com wrote:
+ * flags
+ * bits 1:0:
+ * 0 - Notify(VGA, 0x81) is not used for notification
+ * 1 - Notify(VGA, 0x81) is used for notification
Hi Luca,
於 六,2012-07-28 於 16:56 +0200,Luca Tettamanti 提到:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 03:42:26PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:35:25AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Luca Tettamanti
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 03:42:26PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Luca Tettamanti
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:35:25AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Luca
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 03:42:26PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Luca Tettamanti
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:35:25AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Luca Tettamanti
> >> wrote:
> >> > The other missing bit is how to
? ??2012-07-27 ? 23:32 +0800?joeyli ???
> ? ??2012-07-27 ? 09:21 -0400?Alex Deucher ???
> > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:46 AM, joeyli wrote:
> > >
> > > + * flags
> > > + * bits 1:0:
> > > + * 0 - Notify(VGA, 0x81) is not used for notification
> > > + * 1 - Notify(VGA, 0x81) is used for
? ??2012-07-27 ? 09:21 -0400?Alex Deucher ???
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:46 AM, joeyli wrote:
> >
> > + * flags
> > + * bits 1:0:
> > + * 0 - Notify(VGA, 0x81) is not used for notification
> > + * 1 - Notify(VGA, 0x81) is used for notification
> >
> > Per the above flags, when we detect bit set
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 03:42:26PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:35:25AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com
wrote:
The other
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 03:42:26PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:35:25AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26,
? ??2012-07-26 ? 23:31 -0400?Alex Deucher ???
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:50 PM, joeyli wrote:
> > ? ??2012-07-26 ? 14:58 +0200?Luca Tettamanti ???
> >> - again ACPI video module gets the nodification (in this case
> >> ACPI_VIDEO_NOTIFY_PROBE), re-enumerated and send KEY_SWITCHVIDEOMODE
> >>
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:46:50PM +0800, joeyli wrote:
> ? ??2012-07-26 ? 23:31 -0400?Alex Deucher ???
> > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:50 PM, joeyli wrote:
> > > ? ??2012-07-26 ? 14:58 +0200?Luca Tettamanti ???
> > >> - again ACPI video module gets the nodification (in this case
> > >>
? ??2012-07-26 ? 14:58 +0200?Luca Tettamanti ???
> - again ACPI video module gets the nodification (in this case
> ACPI_VIDEO_NOTIFY_PROBE), re-enumerated and send KEY_SWITCHVIDEOMODE
> - KDE seems this and muck with the screen configuration :(
> - meanwhile the brightness notification is
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:46 AM, joeyli wrote:
> ? ??2012-07-26 ? 23:31 -0400?Alex Deucher ???
>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:50 PM, joeyli wrote:
>> > ? ??2012-07-26 ? 14:58 +0200?Luca Tettamanti ???
>> >> - again ACPI video module gets the nodification (in this case
>> >>
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:50 PM, joeyli wrote:
> ? ??2012-07-26 ? 14:58 +0200?Luca Tettamanti ???
>> - again ACPI video module gets the nodification (in this case
>> ACPI_VIDEO_NOTIFY_PROBE), re-enumerated and send KEY_SWITCHVIDEOMODE
>> - KDE seems this and muck with the screen configuration
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:46:50PM +0800, joeyli wrote:
於 四,2012-07-26 於 23:31 -0400,Alex Deucher 提到:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:50 PM, joeyli j...@suse.com wrote:
於 四,2012-07-26 於 14:58 +0200,Luca Tettamanti 提到:
- again ACPI video module gets the nodification (in this case
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:46 AM, joeyli j...@suse.com wrote:
於 四,2012-07-26 於 23:31 -0400,Alex Deucher 提到:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:50 PM, joeyli j...@suse.com wrote:
於 四,2012-07-26 於 14:58 +0200,Luca Tettamanti 提到:
- again ACPI video module gets the nodification (in this case
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:32 AM, joeyli j...@suse.com wrote:
於 五,2012-07-27 於 09:21 -0400,Alex Deucher 提到:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:46 AM, joeyli j...@suse.com wrote:
+ * flags
+ * bits 1:0:
+ * 0 - Notify(VGA, 0x81) is not used for notification
+ * 1 - Notify(VGA, 0x81) is used for
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:35:25AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Luca Tettamanti
> wrote:
> > The other missing bit is how to actually change the brightness... Alex,
> > do you know what registers to poke?
>
> You need to check if the GPU controls the backlight
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 01:38:09PM -0400, alexdeucher at gmail.com wrote:
> From: Alex Deucher
>
> Add a new header that defines the AMD ACPI interface used
> for laptops, PowerXpress, and chipset specific functionality
> and update the current code to use it.
Great! Now my DSDT makes sense ;)
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 01:38:09PM -0400, alexdeucher at gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Alex Deucher
>>
>> Add a new header that defines the AMD ACPI interface used
>> for laptops, PowerXpress, and chipset specific functionality
>> and update
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 01:38:09PM -0400, alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Alex Deucher alexander.deuc...@amd.com
Add a new header that defines the AMD ACPI interface used
for laptops, PowerXpress, and chipset specific functionality
and update the current code to use it.
Great! Now my
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 01:38:09PM -0400, alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Alex Deucher alexander.deuc...@amd.com
Add a new header that defines the AMD ACPI interface used
for laptops, PowerXpress, and chipset
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:35:25AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com wrote:
The other missing bit is how to actually change the brightness... Alex,
do you know what registers to poke?
You need to check if the GPU controls the
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:35:25AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com wrote:
The other missing bit is how to actually change the brightness... Alex,
do you
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:35:25AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:50 PM, joeyli j...@suse.com wrote:
於 四,2012-07-26 於 14:58 +0200,Luca Tettamanti 提到:
- again ACPI video module gets the nodification (in this case
ACPI_VIDEO_NOTIFY_PROBE), re-enumerated and send KEY_SWITCHVIDEOMODE
- KDE seems this and muck with the screen
From: Alex Deucher
Add a new header that defines the AMD ACPI interface used
for laptops, PowerXpress, and chipset specific functionality
and update the current code to use it.
Todo:
- properly verify the ACPI interfaces
- hook up and handle ACPI notifications
- make
From: Alex Deucher alexander.deuc...@amd.com
Add a new header that defines the AMD ACPI interface used
for laptops, PowerXpress, and chipset specific functionality
and update the current code to use it.
Todo:
- properly verify the ACPI interfaces
- hook up and handle ACPI notifications
- make PX
72 matches
Mail list logo