On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Christian König
wrote:
> Am 12.07.2017 um 17:53 schrieb Jason Ekstrand:
>
> [SNIP]
>
>
>> Is that easier than just waiting in the kernel, I'm not sure how
>> optimised we need this path to be.
>>
>
> I don't think so. I think it's
Am 12.07.2017 um 17:53 schrieb Jason Ekstrand:
[SNIP]
Is that easier than just waiting in the kernel, I'm not sure how
optimised we need this path to be.
I don't think so. I think it's more-or-less the same code regardless
of how it's done. The advantage of doing it in the kernel
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 1:39 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On 12 July 2017 at 17:39, Christian König wrote:
> > Am 11.07.2017 um 17:43 schrieb Jason Ekstrand:
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 12:17 AM, Christian König <
> deathsim...@vodafone.de>
> > wrote:
On 12 July 2017 at 17:39, Christian König wrote:
> Am 11.07.2017 um 17:43 schrieb Jason Ekstrand:
>
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 12:17 AM, Christian König
> wrote:
>>
>> [SNIP]
>
> If we ever want to share fences across processes (which
Am 11.07.2017 um 17:43 schrieb Jason Ekstrand:
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 12:17 AM, Christian König
> wrote:
[SNIP]
If we ever want to share fences across processes
(which we do),
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 12:22 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 02:09:42PM -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Christian König <
> deathsim...@vodafone.de>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Am 10.07.2017 um 17:52 schrieb Jason Ekstrand:
> > >
>
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 12:17 AM, Christian König
wrote:
> Am 11.07.2017 um 04:36 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
>
>> On 11/07/17 06:09 AM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Christian König
>>>
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 02:09:42PM -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Christian König
> wrote:
>
> > Am 10.07.2017 um 17:52 schrieb Jason Ekstrand:
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 8:45 AM, Christian König
> > wrote:
Am 11.07.2017 um 04:36 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On 11/07/17 06:09 AM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Christian König
> wrote:
Am 10.07.2017 um 17:52 schrieb Jason Ekstrand:
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 8:45
On 11/07/17 06:09 AM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Christian König
> > wrote:
>
> Am 10.07.2017 um 17:52 schrieb Jason Ekstrand:
>> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 8:45 AM, Christian König
>>
>
> *Cc:* Dave Airlie <airl...@gmail.com> <airl...@gmail.com>; Maling list -
> DRI developers <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
> <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>; amd-gfx mailing list
> <amd-...@lists.freedesktop.org> <amd-...@lists.freedesktop.or
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Christian König
wrote:
> Am 10.07.2017 um 17:52 schrieb Jason Ekstrand:
>
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 8:45 AM, Christian König
> wrote:
>
>> Am 10.07.2017 um 17:28 schrieb Jason Ekstrand:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017
Ekstrand
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 11:53 AM
To: Christian König <deathsim...@vodafone.de>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airl...@gmail.com>; Maling list - DRI developers
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>; amd-gfx mailing list
<amd-...@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/sy
Am 10.07.2017 um 17:52 schrieb Jason Ekstrand:
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 8:45 AM, Christian König
> wrote:
Am 10.07.2017 um 17:28 schrieb Jason Ekstrand:
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Dave Airlie
<airl...@gmail.com>; Maling list - DRI developers
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>; amd-gfx mailing list
<amd-...@lists.freedesktop.org>
*Subject:* Re: [PATCH] drm/syncobj: add sync obj wait interface. (v6)
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 8:45 AM, Christian König
<deathsim...@v
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 8:45 AM, Christian König
wrote:
> Am 10.07.2017 um 17:28 schrieb Jason Ekstrand:
>
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
>> From: Dave Airlie
>>
>> This interface will allow sync object to
Am 10.07.2017 um 17:28 schrieb Jason Ekstrand:
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Dave Airlie > wrote:
From: Dave Airlie >
This interface will allow sync object to be used to back
Vulkan
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> From: Dave Airlie
>
> This interface will allow sync object to be used to back
> Vulkan fences. This API is pretty much the vulkan fence waiting
> API, and I've ported the code from amdgpu.
>
> v2:
From: Dave Airlie
This interface will allow sync object to be used to back
Vulkan fences. This API is pretty much the vulkan fence waiting
API, and I've ported the code from amdgpu.
v2: accept relative timeout, pass remaining time back
to userspace.
v3: return to absolute
19 matches
Mail list logo