On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 3:22 AM, Christian König
wrote:
> Am 27.01.2017 um 08:30 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 07:23:58AM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
>>>
>>> On 01/27/2017 03:29 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 26/01/17 09:46 AM, Sinclair Yeh wrote:
>
> On We
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 03:43:18PM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> Am 27.01.2017 um 15:12 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 09:22:47AM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> > > Am 27.01.2017 um 08:30 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 07:23:58AM +0100, Thomas Hellstro
Am 27.01.2017 um 15:12 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 09:22:47AM +0100, Christian König wrote:
Am 27.01.2017 um 08:30 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 07:23:58AM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
On 01/27/2017 03:29 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 26/01/17 09:46 AM, Sin
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 09:22:47AM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> Am 27.01.2017 um 08:30 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 07:23:58AM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> > > On 01/27/2017 03:29 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > > On 26/01/17 09:46 AM, Sinclair Yeh wrote:
> > > > > On We
Am 27.01.2017 um 08:30 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 07:23:58AM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
On 01/27/2017 03:29 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 26/01/17 09:46 AM, Sinclair Yeh wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:49:33AM +0100, Christian König wrote:
Am 25.01.2017 um 10:25 schrie
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 07:23:58AM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> On 01/27/2017 03:29 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On 26/01/17 09:46 AM, Sinclair Yeh wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:49:33AM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> >>> Am 25.01.2017 um 10:25 schrieb Thomas Hellstrom:
> On 01/25
On 01/27/2017 03:29 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 26/01/17 09:46 AM, Sinclair Yeh wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:49:33AM +0100, Christian König wrote:
>>> Am 25.01.2017 um 10:25 schrieb Thomas Hellstrom:
On 01/25/2017 09:21 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> From: Michel Dänzer
>
>
On 26/01/17 09:46 AM, Sinclair Yeh wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:49:33AM +0100, Christian König wrote:
>> Am 25.01.2017 um 10:25 schrieb Thomas Hellstrom:
>>> On 01/25/2017 09:21 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
From: Michel Dänzer
The current caching state may not be tt_cached, even
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:49:33AM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> Am 25.01.2017 um 10:25 schrieb Thomas Hellstrom:
> >On 01/25/2017 09:21 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >>From: Michel Dänzer
> >>
> >>The current caching state may not be tt_cached, even though the
> >>placement contains TTM_PL_FLAG_CA
Am 25.01.2017 um 10:25 schrieb Thomas Hellstrom:
On 01/25/2017 09:21 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
From: Michel Dänzer
The current caching state may not be tt_cached, even though the
placement contains TTM_PL_FLAG_CACHED, because placement can contain
multiple caching flags. Trying to swap out such
On 01/25/2017 09:21 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> From: Michel Dänzer
>
> The current caching state may not be tt_cached, even though the
> placement contains TTM_PL_FLAG_CACHED, because placement can contain
> multiple caching flags. Trying to swap out such a BO would trip up the
>
> BUG_ON(tt
From: Michel Dänzer
The current caching state may not be tt_cached, even though the
placement contains TTM_PL_FLAG_CACHED, because placement can contain
multiple caching flags. Trying to swap out such a BO would trip up the
BUG_ON(ttm->caching_state != tt_cached);
in ttm_tt_swapout.
Cc
12 matches
Mail list logo