[PATCH] drm: Remove DRIVER_DATE and CORE_DATE

2011-01-03 Thread Sedat Dilek
2011/1/3 Pekka Paalanen : > On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 10:51:26 +0100 > Sedat Dilek wrote: > >> DRIVER_DATE is not maintained or upgraded on changes in many drm >> drivers. >> >> For example radeon has one DRIVER_DATE for User and Kernel >> ModeSetting driver, this makes no sense as UMS and KMS driver >>

[PATCH] drm: Remove DRIVER_DATE and CORE_DATE

2011-01-03 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 10:51:26 +0100 Sedat Dilek wrote: > DRIVER_DATE is not maintained or upgraded on changes in many drm > drivers. > > For example radeon has one DRIVER_DATE for User and Kernel > ModeSetting driver, this makes no sense as UMS and KMS driver > have different versions. And of cou

Re: [PATCH] drm: Remove DRIVER_DATE and CORE_DATE

2011-01-03 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 10:51:26 +0100 Sedat Dilek wrote: > DRIVER_DATE is not maintained or upgraded on changes in many drm > drivers. > > For example radeon has one DRIVER_DATE for User and Kernel > ModeSetting driver, this makes no sense as UMS and KMS driver > have different versions. And of cou

[PATCH] drm: Remove DRIVER_DATE and CORE_DATE

2010-12-22 Thread Sedat Dilek
DRIVER_DATE is not maintained or upgraded on changes in many drm drivers. For example radeon has one DRIVER_DATE for User and Kernel ModeSetting driver, this makes no sense as UMS and KMS driver have different versions. And of course this all increases maintenance, too. For radeon it is enough to

[PATCH] drm: Remove DRIVER_DATE and CORE_DATE

2010-12-22 Thread Sedat Dilek
DRIVER_DATE is not maintained or upgraded on changes in many drm drivers. For example radeon has one DRIVER_DATE for User and Kernel ModeSetting driver, this makes no sense as UMS and KMS driver have different versions. And of course this all increases maintenance, too. For radeon it is enough to