On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 12:13:08PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 09:43:05AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Since we know that locking is broken in that case and it's more
> > important to not flood the dmesg with random gunk.
> >
> > Cc: Dave Airlie
> > Cc: Borislav Pet
On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 12:13:08PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 09:43:05AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Since we know that locking is broken in that case and it's more
> > important to not flood the dmesg with random gunk.
> >
> > Cc: Dave Airlie
> > Cc: Borislav Pet
On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 09:43:05AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Since we know that locking is broken in that case and it's more
> important to not flood the dmesg with random gunk.
>
> Cc: Dave Airlie
> Cc: Borislav Petkov
> References:
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/lin
Since we know that locking is broken in that case and it's more
important to not flood the dmesg with random gunk.
Cc: Dave Airlie
Cc: Borislav Petkov
References:
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/linux.kernel/QFzFxSUeV4I
Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vet
On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 09:43:05AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Since we know that locking is broken in that case and it's more
> important to not flood the dmesg with random gunk.
>
> Cc: Dave Airlie
> Cc: Borislav Petkov
> References:
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/lin
Since we know that locking is broken in that case and it's more
important to not flood the dmesg with random gunk.
Cc: Dave Airlie
Cc: Borislav Petkov
References:
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/linux.kernel/QFzFxSUeV4I
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter