Re: [PATCH] drm: remove unneeded break

2020-11-08 Thread Sam Ravnborg
Hi Tom On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 07:06:41PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > Hi Tom > On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 09:31:15AM -0700, t...@redhat.com wrote: > > From: Tom Rix > > > > A break is not needed if it is preceded by a return or break > > > > Signed-off-by: Tom Rix > > Looks good and builds with

Re: [PATCH] drm: remove unneeded break

2020-10-19 Thread Sam Ravnborg
Hi Tom On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 09:31:15AM -0700, t...@redhat.com wrote: > From: Tom Rix > > A break is not needed if it is preceded by a return or break > > Signed-off-by: Tom Rix Looks good and builds with no warnings. One of the diffs made me - "oh this looks wrong". But after I looked

[PATCH] drm: remove unneeded break

2020-10-19 Thread trix
From: Tom Rix A break is not needed if it is preceded by a return or break Signed-off-by: Tom Rix --- drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c | 5 - drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/pll.c | 1 - drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/mcp77.c | 3 ---