Hello Lucas,
On 5/7/22 18:20, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 03:22:25PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> Commit d258d00fb9c7 ("fbdev: efifb: Cleanup fb_info in .fb_destroy rather
>> than .remove") attempted to fix a use-after-free error due driver freeing
>> the fb_info
On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 03:22:25PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
Commit d258d00fb9c7 ("fbdev: efifb: Cleanup fb_info in .fb_destroy rather
than .remove") attempted to fix a use-after-free error due driver freeing
the fb_info in the .remove handler instead of doing it in .fb_destroy.
On 06.05.2022 15:22, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
Commit d258d00fb9c7 ("fbdev: efifb: Cleanup fb_info in .fb_destroy rather
than .remove") attempted to fix a use-after-free error due driver freeing
the fb_info in the .remove handler instead of doing it in .fb_destroy.
But ironically that
Hi Javier,
On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 03:22:25PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Commit d258d00fb9c7 ("fbdev: efifb: Cleanup fb_info in .fb_destroy rather
> than .remove") attempted to fix a use-after-free error due driver freeing
> the fb_info in the .remove handler instead of doing it in
Am 06.05.22 um 15:22 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas:
Commit d258d00fb9c7 ("fbdev: efifb: Cleanup fb_info in .fb_destroy rather
than .remove") attempted to fix a use-after-free error due driver freeing
the fb_info in the .remove handler instead of doing it in .fb_destroy.
But ironically that
Commit d258d00fb9c7 ("fbdev: efifb: Cleanup fb_info in .fb_destroy rather
than .remove") attempted to fix a use-after-free error due driver freeing
the fb_info in the .remove handler instead of doing it in .fb_destroy.
But ironically that change introduced yet another use-after-free since the
