At Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:06:28 +0100 (CET),
Indan Zupancic wrote:
>
> On Thu, March 10, 2011 09:25, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > At Thu, 10 Mar 2011 08:49:37 +0100,
> > Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >>
> >> At Thu, 10 Mar 2011 06:50:09 +0100 (CET),
> >> Indan Zupancic wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hello,
> >> >
> >> >
At Thu, 10 Mar 2011 09:45:18 +0100 (CET),
Indan Zupancic wrote:
>
> On Thu, March 10, 2011 08:49, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > At Thu, 10 Mar 2011 06:50:09 +0100 (CET),
> > Indan Zupancic wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> On Fri, March 4, 2011 19:47, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >> > Alex, can you confirm
On Thu, March 10, 2011 09:25, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Thu, 10 Mar 2011 08:49:37 +0100,
> Takashi Iwai wrote:
>>
>> At Thu, 10 Mar 2011 06:50:09 +0100 (CET),
>> Indan Zupancic wrote:
>> >
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > On Fri, March 4, 2011 19:47, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> > > Alex, can you confirm that the
On Thu, March 10, 2011 08:49, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Thu, 10 Mar 2011 06:50:09 +0100 (CET),
> Indan Zupancic wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Fri, March 4, 2011 19:47, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> > Alex, can you confirm that the revert of 951f3512dba5 plus the
>> > one-liner patch from Takashi that
At Thu, 10 Mar 2011 08:49:37 +0100,
Takashi Iwai wrote:
>
> At Thu, 10 Mar 2011 06:50:09 +0100 (CET),
> Indan Zupancic wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Fri, March 4, 2011 19:47, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > Alex, can you confirm that the revert of 951f3512dba5 plus the
> > > one-liner patch from
At Thu, 10 Mar 2011 06:50:09 +0100 (CET),
Indan Zupancic wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, March 4, 2011 19:47, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Alex, can you confirm that the revert of 951f3512dba5 plus the
> > one-liner patch from Takashi that Indan quoted also works for you?
> >
> > Linus
drm/i915: Fix DPMS and suspend interaction for intel_panel.c
When suspending intel_panel_disable_backlight() is never called,
but intel_panel_enable_backlight() is called at resume. With the
effect that if the brightness was ever changed after screen
blanking, the wrong brightness gets restored
Hello,
On Fri, March 4, 2011 19:47, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Alex, can you confirm that the revert of 951f3512dba5 plus the
> one-liner patch from Takashi that Indan quoted also works for you?
>
> Linus
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Indan Zupancic wrote:
>>
>> So please
At Thu, 10 Mar 2011 08:49:37 +0100,
Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Thu, 10 Mar 2011 06:50:09 +0100 (CET),
Indan Zupancic wrote:
Hello,
On Fri, March 4, 2011 19:47, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Alex, can you confirm that the revert of 951f3512dba5 plus the
one-liner patch from Takashi that
On Thu, March 10, 2011 08:49, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Thu, 10 Mar 2011 06:50:09 +0100 (CET),
Indan Zupancic wrote:
Hello,
On Fri, March 4, 2011 19:47, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Alex, can you confirm that the revert of 951f3512dba5 plus the
one-liner patch from Takashi that Indan quoted also
On Thu, March 10, 2011 09:25, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Thu, 10 Mar 2011 08:49:37 +0100,
Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Thu, 10 Mar 2011 06:50:09 +0100 (CET),
Indan Zupancic wrote:
Hello,
On Fri, March 4, 2011 19:47, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Alex, can you confirm that the revert of 951f3512dba5
At Thu, 10 Mar 2011 09:45:18 +0100 (CET),
Indan Zupancic wrote:
On Thu, March 10, 2011 08:49, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Thu, 10 Mar 2011 06:50:09 +0100 (CET),
Indan Zupancic wrote:
Hello,
On Fri, March 4, 2011 19:47, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Alex, can you confirm that the revert of
At Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:06:28 +0100 (CET),
Indan Zupancic wrote:
On Thu, March 10, 2011 09:25, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Thu, 10 Mar 2011 08:49:37 +0100,
Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Thu, 10 Mar 2011 06:50:09 +0100 (CET),
Indan Zupancic wrote:
Hello,
On Fri, March 4, 2011 19:47,
Hello,
On Fri, March 4, 2011 19:47, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Alex, can you confirm that the revert of 951f3512dba5 plus the
one-liner patch from Takashi that Indan quoted also works for you?
Linus
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Indan Zupancic in...@nul.nu wrote:
So please
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 19:47, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> Alex, can you confirm that the revert of 951f3512dba5 plus the
> one-liner patch from Takashi that Indan quoted also works for you?
I afraid mine is a different case, because backlight in this system
works properly even with Indan's patch
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 19:47, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
Alex, can you confirm that the revert of 951f3512dba5 plus the
one-liner patch from Takashi that Indan quoted also works for you?
I afraid mine is a different case, because backlight in this system
works properly
Indan Zupancic wrote:
> What I don't understand is how BIOS makers could know about those bits.
They have relationships with Intel since 30 years, ie. they get what
they need in one form or other.
//Peter
On Fri, March 4, 2011 19:47, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Alex, can you confirm that the revert of 951f3512dba5 plus the
> one-liner patch from Takashi that Indan quoted also works for you?
>
> Linus
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Indan Zupancic wrote:
>>
>> So please revert my
Alex, can you confirm that the revert of 951f3512dba5 plus the
one-liner patch from Takashi that Indan quoted also works for you?
Linus
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Indan Zupancic wrote:
>
> So please revert my patch and apply Takashi Iwai's, which fixes the
> most immediate
Hello,
On Wed, February 23, 2011 02:09, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Tino Keitel wrote:
>>
>> I just tried 2.6.38-rc6 on my ThinkPad X61s without any other DRM
>> related patches, and my backlight issue is gone.
>
> I applied Indan's fix in -rc6 (commit 951f3512dba5),
Alex, can you confirm that the revert of 951f3512dba5 plus the
one-liner patch from Takashi that Indan quoted also works for you?
Linus
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Indan Zupancic in...@nul.nu wrote:
So please revert my patch and apply Takashi Iwai's, which fixes the
most
On Fri, March 4, 2011 19:47, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Alex, can you confirm that the revert of 951f3512dba5 plus the
one-liner patch from Takashi that Indan quoted also works for you?
Linus
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Indan Zupancic in...@nul.nu wrote:
So please revert my
Indan Zupancic wrote:
What I don't understand is how BIOS makers could know about those bits.
They have relationships with Intel since 30 years, ie. they get what
they need in one form or other.
//Peter
___
dri-devel mailing list
Hello,
On Wed, February 23, 2011 02:09, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Tino Keitel tino.kei...@tikei.de wrote:
I just tried 2.6.38-rc6 on my ThinkPad X61s without any other DRM
related patches, and my backlight issue is gone.
I applied Indan's fix in -rc6 (commit
On Tue, February 22, 2011 22:04, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 15:07:49 -0800
> Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 4:26 AM, Alex Riesen wrote:
>> > On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 13:11, Alex Riesen wrote:
>> >>> Lastly, could you verify that my patch at
>> >>>
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 13:04:40 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 15:07:49 -0800
> Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 4:26 AM, Alex Riesen wrote:
> > > On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 13:11, Alex Riesen wrote:
> > >>> Lastly, could you verify that my patch at
> > >>>
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Tino Keitel wrote:
>
> I just tried 2.6.38-rc6 on my ThinkPad X61s without any other DRM
> related patches, and my backlight issue is gone.
I applied Indan's fix in -rc6 (commit 951f3512dba5), since it had
several testers and seemed to simplify the code nicely
On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 15:07:49 -0800
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 4:26 AM, Alex Riesen wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 13:11, Alex Riesen wrote:
> >>> Lastly, could you verify that my patch at
> >>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/16/447 fixes
> >>> it for you too? (Make sure
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 4:26 AM, Alex Riesen wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 13:11, Alex Riesen wrote:
>>> Lastly, could you verify that my patch at
>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/16/447 fixes
>>> it for you too? (Make sure you're at max brightness before rebooting.)
>>
>> I'll try it now.
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 13:11, Alex Riesen wrote:
>> Lastly, could you verify that my patch at
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/16/447 fixes
>> it for you too? (Make sure you're at max brightness before rebooting.)
>
> I'll try it now.
>
I can confirm that it does fix backlight in my case (Dell
Sorry for this late answer. I only get a very little time for this.
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 05:57, Indan Zupancic wrote:
> On Thu, February 17, 2011 23:13, Tino Keitel wrote:
>> with kernel 2.6.37, the display brightness of my ThinkPad X61s was
>> always reduced after lid open, resume from
Sorry for this late answer. I only get a very little time for this.
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 05:57, Indan Zupancic in...@nul.nu wrote:
On Thu, February 17, 2011 23:13, Tino Keitel wrote:
with kernel 2.6.37, the display brightness of my ThinkPad X61s was
always reduced after lid open, resume
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 13:11, Alex Riesen raa.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Lastly, could you verify that my patch at
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/16/447 fixes
it for you too? (Make sure you're at max brightness before rebooting.)
I'll try it now.
I can confirm that it does fix backlight in my
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 4:26 AM, Alex Riesen raa.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 13:11, Alex Riesen raa.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Lastly, could you verify that my patch at
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/16/447 fixes
it for you too? (Make sure you're at max brightness before
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 20:26:58 +0100, Alex Riesen wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen
>
> ---
> Linus Torvalds, Wed, Feb 16, 2011 05:16:01 +0100:
> > Most of the changes are pretty spread out and small, with drivers/gpu
> > (radeon and i915) somewhat standing out from the pack. ...
>
> The
On Thu, February 17, 2011 23:13, Tino Keitel wrote:
> with kernel 2.6.37, the display brightness of my ThinkPad X61s was
> always reduced after lid open, resume from suspend etc. With this
> patch on top of 2.6.38-rc5, the problem is gone. Thanks.
Tino, I think Alex's patch only hides the
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 20:26:58 +0100, Alex Riesen wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen
>
> ---
> Linus Torvalds, Wed, Feb 16, 2011 05:16:01 +0100:
> > Most of the changes are pretty spread out and small, with drivers/gpu
> > (radeon and i915) somewhat standing out from the pack. ...
>
> The
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 20:26:58 +0100, Alex Riesen wrote:
Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen raa.l...@gmail.com
---
Linus Torvalds, Wed, Feb 16, 2011 05:16:01 +0100:
Most of the changes are pretty spread out and small, with drivers/gpu
(radeon and i915) somewhat standing out from the pack. ...
On Thu, February 17, 2011 23:13, Tino Keitel wrote:
with kernel 2.6.37, the display brightness of my ThinkPad X61s was
always reduced after lid open, resume from suspend etc. With this
patch on top of 2.6.38-rc5, the problem is gone. Thanks.
Tino, I think Alex's patch only hides the problem
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 21:05, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 20:59:35 +0100
> Alex Riesen wrote:
>>
>> I don't think it is related. I don't have problems switching
>> the outputs (frankly, didn't try) and I do have problems
>> restoring backlight, very similar to what I had earlier
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 20:54, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 20:46:45 +0100
> Alex Riesen wrote:
>> > The backlight level on this Dell XPS M1330 reduces every time I reopen
>> > the lid, and BIOS does not seem to know anything about that (the
>> > keyboard shortcuts to set backlight
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 20:26, Alex Riesen wrote:
> Linus Torvalds, Wed, Feb 16, 2011 05:16:01 +0100:
>> Most of the changes are pretty spread out and small, with drivers/gpu
>> (radeon and i915) somewhat standing out from the pack. ...
>
> The backlight level on this Dell XPS M1330 reduces every
Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen
---
Linus Torvalds, Wed, Feb 16, 2011 05:16:01 +0100:
> Most of the changes are pretty spread out and small, with drivers/gpu
> (radeon and i915) somewhat standing out from the pack. ...
The backlight level on this Dell XPS M1330 reduces every time I reopen the
lid,
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 20:59:35 +0100
Alex Riesen wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 20:54, Jesse Barnes
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 20:46:45 +0100
> > Alex Riesen wrote:
> >> > The backlight level on this Dell XPS M1330 reduces every time I reopen
> >> > the lid, and BIOS does not seem to
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 20:46:45 +0100
Alex Riesen wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 20:26, Alex Riesen wrote:
> > Linus Torvalds, Wed, Feb 16, 2011 05:16:01 +0100:
> >> Most of the changes are pretty spread out and small, with drivers/gpu
> >> (radeon and i915) somewhat standing out from the pack.
45 matches
Mail list logo
