On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Chris Wilson
wrote:
> Quoting Jason Ekstrand (2017-08-03 19:06:02)
> > I'm not concerned about what happens to racy clients. They get what
> they get.
> > What concerns me is what happens if somehow the fence is replaced and
> deleted
> > before i915_gem_request_
Quoting Jason Ekstrand (2017-08-03 19:06:02)
> I'm not concerned about what happens to racy clients. They get what they
> get.
> What concerns me is what happens if somehow the fence is replaced and deleted
> before i915_gem_request_await_dma_fence takes it's reference. Can this cause
> the ker
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Chris Wilson
wrote:
> Quoting Jason Ekstrand (2017-07-05 22:15:09)
> > On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Jason Ekstrand
> wrote:
> >
> > This commit adds support for waiting on or signaling DRM syncobjs as
> > part of execbuf. It does so by hijacking the c
Quoting Jason Ekstrand (2017-07-05 22:15:09)
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
> This commit adds support for waiting on or signaling DRM syncobjs as
> part of execbuf. It does so by hijacking the currently unused cliprects
> pointer to instead point to an arr
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> This commit adds support for waiting on or signaling DRM syncobjs as
> part of execbuf. It does so by hijacking the currently unused cliprects
> pointer to instead point to an array of i915_gem_exec_fence structs
> which containe a DRM sync
This commit adds support for waiting on or signaling DRM syncobjs as
part of execbuf. It does so by hijacking the currently unused cliprects
pointer to instead point to an array of i915_gem_exec_fence structs
which containe a DRM syncobj and a flags parameter which specifies
whether to wait on it
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Chris Wilson
wrote:
> Quoting Jason Ekstrand (2017-07-05 19:32:21)
> > On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Chris Wilson
> wrote:
> >
> > Quoting Jason Ekstrand (2017-07-05 18:21:22)
> > > This commit adds support for waiting on or signaling DRM syncobjs
> as
Quoting Jason Ekstrand (2017-07-05 19:32:21)
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Chris Wilson
> wrote:
>
> Quoting Jason Ekstrand (2017-07-05 18:21:22)
> > This commit adds support for waiting on or signaling DRM syncobjs as
> > part of execbuf. It does so by hijacking the currently
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Chris Wilson
wrote:
> Quoting Jason Ekstrand (2017-07-05 18:21:22)
> > This commit adds support for waiting on or signaling DRM syncobjs as
> > part of execbuf. It does so by hijacking the currently unused cliprects
> > pointer to instead point to an array of i91
Quoting Jason Ekstrand (2017-07-05 18:21:22)
> This commit adds support for waiting on or signaling DRM syncobjs as
> part of execbuf. It does so by hijacking the currently unused cliprects
> pointer to instead point to an array of i915_gem_exec_fence structs
> which containe a DRM syncobj and a f
This commit adds support for waiting on or signaling DRM syncobjs as
part of execbuf. It does so by hijacking the currently unused cliprects
pointer to instead point to an array of i915_gem_exec_fence structs
which containe a DRM syncobj and a flags parameter which specifies
whether to wait on it
11 matches
Mail list logo
