On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 09:46:57AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 02/12/2014 12:30 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > The bulk of the Tegra DRM driver is GPL v2 licensed, but some of the new
> > subdrivers were licensed under an MIT license. This was simply oversight
> > on my part.
> >
> > One
On 02/12/2014 12:13 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 09:46:57AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 02/12/2014 12:30 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>> The bulk of the Tegra DRM driver is GPL v2 licensed, but some of the new
>>> subdrivers were licensed under an MIT license. This was
On 02/12/2014 12:30 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> The bulk of the Tegra DRM driver is GPL v2 licensed, but some of the new
> subdrivers were licensed under an MIT license. This was simply oversight
> on my part.
>
> One exception to this is the public header file that will eventually be
> used
The bulk of the Tegra DRM driver is GPL v2 licensed, but some of the new
subdrivers were licensed under an MIT license. This was simply oversight
on my part.
One exception to this is the public header file that will eventually be
used within libdrm. Since all the other headers in libdrm use the
