Re: [PATCH 0/5] drm/tidss: Use new connector model for tidss

2020-10-29 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
On 28/10/2020 16:19, Nikhil Devshatwar wrote: >> Also, with J7 EVM and DP, when I unload the modules I see: >> > I confirm the same issue. > I doubt if it is because of the change I did. > Will try to revert the patches and confirm again My guess is that it's not your patches as such, but that

Re: [PATCH 0/5] drm/tidss: Use new connector model for tidss

2020-10-28 Thread Nikhil Devshatwar
On 15:11-20201019, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > Hi Nikhil, > > On 16/10/2020 13:39, Nikhil Devshatwar wrote: > > This series moves the tidss to using new connectoe model, where the > > SoC driver (tidss) creates the connector and all the bridges are > > attached with the flag

Re: [PATCH 0/5] drm/tidss: Use new connector model for tidss

2020-10-19 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
Hi Nikhil, On 16/10/2020 13:39, Nikhil Devshatwar wrote: > This series moves the tidss to using new connectoe model, where the > SoC driver (tidss) creates the connector and all the bridges are > attached with the flag DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR > > Since the bridges do not create the

[PATCH 0/5] drm/tidss: Use new connector model for tidss

2020-10-16 Thread Nikhil Devshatwar
This series moves the tidss to using new connectoe model, where the SoC driver (tidss) creates the connector and all the bridges are attached with the flag DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR Since the bridges do not create the connector, the bus format and bus_flag is set after the format