[PATCH 0/7] prepare for atomic.. the great propertyification

2014-07-25 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:56:07AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: [snip] > ok, it's entirely possibly that I'm missunderstanding a bit your proposal.. Yeah I get that feeling a bit too. I'll cut out the technical details for now and will try to concentrate on one example. Maybe that clarifies. [snip]

[PATCH 0/7] prepare for atomic.. the great propertyification

2014-07-25 Thread Rob Clark
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 4:15 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:56:07AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: > [snip] > >> ok, it's entirely possibly that I'm missunderstanding a bit your proposal.. > > Yeah I get that feeling a bit too. I'll cut out the technical details for > now and will

[PATCH 0/7] prepare for atomic.. the great propertyification

2014-07-24 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 09:36:20AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 8:25 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 03:38:13PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: > >> This is mostly just a rebase+resend. Was going to send it a bit earlier > >> but had a few things to fix up as a

[PATCH 0/7] prepare for atomic.. the great propertyification

2014-07-24 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 03:38:13PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: > This is mostly just a rebase+resend. Was going to send it a bit earlier > but had a few things to fix up as a result of the rebase. > > At this point, I think next steps are roughly: > 1) introduce plane->mutex > 2) decide what we want

[PATCH 0/7] prepare for atomic.. the great propertyification

2014-07-24 Thread Rob Clark
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 09:36:20AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 8:25 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> > On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 03:38:13PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: >> >> This is mostly just a rebase+resend. Was going to

[PATCH 0/7] prepare for atomic.. the great propertyification

2014-07-24 Thread Rob Clark
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 8:25 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 03:38:13PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: >> This is mostly just a rebase+resend. Was going to send it a bit earlier >> but had a few things to fix up as a result of the rebase. >> >> At this point, I think next steps are

[PATCH 0/7] prepare for atomic.. the great propertyification

2014-07-23 Thread Rob Clark
This is mostly just a rebase+resend. Was going to send it a bit earlier but had a few things to fix up as a result of the rebase. At this point, I think next steps are roughly: 1) introduce plane->mutex 2) decide what we want to do about events 3) add actual ioctl I think we could shoot for