[PATCH 02/23] drm/exynos: calculate vrefresh instead of use a fixed value

2015-07-02 Thread Joonyoung Shim
On 06/24/2015 06:35 AM, Gustavo Padovan wrote: > From: Gustavo Padovan > > When mode's vrefresh is zero we should ask DRM core to calculate vrefresh > for us so we can get the correct value instead of relying on fixed value > defined in a macro. But if vrefresh is still zero we should fail the >

[PATCH 02/23] drm/exynos: calculate vrefresh instead of use a fixed value

2015-07-02 Thread Gustavo Padovan
Hi Joonyoung, 2015-07-02 Joonyoung Shim : > On 06/24/2015 06:35 AM, Gustavo Padovan wrote: > > From: Gustavo Padovan > > > > When mode's vrefresh is zero we should ask DRM core to calculate vrefresh > > for us so we can get the correct value instead of relying on fixed value > > defined in a

[PATCH 02/23] drm/exynos: calculate vrefresh instead of use a fixed value

2015-06-23 Thread Gustavo Padovan
From: Gustavo Padovan When mode's vrefresh is zero we should ask DRM core to calculate vrefresh for us so we can get the correct value instead of relying on fixed value defined in a macro. But if vrefresh is still zero we should fail the update. Suggested-by: